Share/E-Mail

It’s a fabulous idea, and as someone who isn’t ashamed to admit he’s a magazine junkie, I’m very excited by it. But I’m also very frustrated by the interface in its current state.

I wanted, for instance, for the mention of Computerworld above to link to the Computerworld archive on Book Search. But I have no idea how to find it. Weird as it sounds, searching Google Book Search for Computerworld doesn’t pull it up. I know it’s there. Somewhere.

(Aha! I found a link to Computerworld’s first issue in a blog–no thanks to Book Search.)

If you somehow figure out how to pull up a particular magazine on Book Search, you get an interface that’s in many ways terrific, with browsable thumbnails of covers and a readers that lets you pull up any issue for perusal. Here’s New York magazine, which I only found because Google’s blog post on the new magazines pointed to it. (The URL? The memorable http://books.google.com/books?id=OugCAAAAMBAJ.)

I still can’t tell, however, whether the “Search in this magazine” feature searches all issues of New York, or just the one that’s currently selected. (I think it’s the latter, but I’m not going to make any bets.)

Are there advanced features like keyword searches that might let you find a particular magazine or search all issues of it? Maybe. There’s an advanced search feature–but it’s not linked to from all pages in Book Search, and while it lets you restrict searches to magazines rather than books, this didn’t help me find stuff I was looking for. (When I restricted my search for Computerworld to magazines, it pulled up scads of issues of…sister publication CIO. Which mentions Computerworld in some boilerplate text.)

Part of the problem here is revealed by the very name of the service: What exactly are magazines doing in something called Google Book Search? (Side note: Book Search originally had the more appropriate name of Google Print.) They’re a different beast, and call for a different set of search tools. Book Search seems to be focused on letting you search across its entire archive of books, magazines, and other items; that’s a big part of the search challenge, but far from all of it.

Am I being too cranky about a wonderful, wildly ambitious initiative that’s an outstanding example of Google following its corporate mission? Probably, considering that I plan to spend plenty of quality time burrowing through its riches, starting tonight. It’s just that it would be so much more useful if finding stuff–specific magazines and articles within them–was a whole lot easier.

Share/E-Mail