14 Questions About Palm’s Amazing Pre

By  |  Friday, January 9, 2009 at 8:27 am

 Palm Pre SmartphoneWhat a difference a demo makes. For the past few years, declaring Palm to be in decline, irrelevant, or just plain dead has been a national pastime among tech pundits. The unveiling of the upcoming Palm Pre smartphone and its WebOS operating system yesterday here at CES changes all that. It will still be a challenge for Palm to restore itself to a leadership role in the smartphone industry it created. But its demo yesterday was so impressive on so many fronts that I can’t imagine any rational observer insisting that Palm is Still Dead until the Pre has a chance to prove itself.

Palm’s demo of the Pre was deep enough to answer plenty of questions about the device and its OS. But I’m left with plenty of others. Some of them may have answers right now (I’m going to pay a visit to Palm here at CES and try to get them). Some will only be answered in the months and years to come.

If you’ve got solid information or smart guesses on any of this stuff, I’d love to hear them….

1. Why did Palm announce the Pre now? Presumably in part because FCC filings make it tough to keep a phone under wraps until the very last moment before it ships. (If the Pre appears right at the end of its promised “first half of 2009” schedule, it’ll follow roughly the same announcement-to-shipping timetable as the original iPhone.)  Normally, companies are really careful about pre-announcing products and thereby running the risk of people losing interest in the products that they’re already selling. But you gotta assume that Palm in its current state doesn’t have much to lose, and that the Pre is so radically different from current Palm models like the Centro that it isn’t really competition for them.

2. How long will it be Sprint-only? A few of the people who I have discussed the Pre with here at CES have winced when they’ve uttered the word “Sprint.” Or, at least, not looked terribly happy. Palm has apparently said it’s working on a GSM Pre; it’ll be interesting to see how long it takes to show up, and who sells it when it does.

3. Does it have iPhone-style visual voicemail? I sure hope so. But Palm didn’t have much to say about the Pre’s phone features at its unveiling.

4. What happens to the current Palm phone lineup? Will it continue to produce models such as the cheap Palm OS-based Centro and more powerful, Windows Mobile-based Treo Pro? Do they all go away the moment the Pre ships? Will they eventually be replaced with WebOS-based phones, like a $99 WebOS-powered Centro equivalent?

5. Why only 8GB?  Palm is one of the first companies to adopt Apple’s approach of sealing a lot of flash memory into a phone. But it’s not matching Apple’s 16GB iPhone 3G. It’s the one obvious area where the iPhone trumps the Pre from a hardware standpoint.

6. Will developers climb on board? Palm’s strategy of making WebOS a platform that anyone who knows how to write Web apps can use should help. But developers have to choose priorities, and they’ll only choose WebOS if they think there’s a critical mass of Pre owners out there who might use their apps.

7. Will classic PalmOS apps appear in Pre versions? Such as PocketSensei’s Silver Screen launcher, for instance. It would be cool if developers with a long history with Palm dived in to make the Pre more useful. And Palm mentioned that DataViz is on board, which may mean that a Pre version of Documents to Go is in the works.

8. Is there any sort of compatibility with existing Palm OS apps? I’m kind of guessing not–the webOS is such a radical departure from PalmOS that it’s hard to imagine it running old apps. But maybe there’s some sort of compatibility mode, not unlike the one in early versions of Apple’s OS X that let them run older Mac programs.

9. Will Palm fanatics embrace it? I suspect there are more people who used to be Palm fanatics than ones who currently consider themselves to be ones. But there are surely still a fair number of hardcore Treo enthusiasts. The Pre is such a radical departure from its predecessors that it’s not a given that it’ll delight Palm enthusiasts. 

10. What happens to Windows Mobile-powered Palm phones? When Palm got into the Windows Mobile phone business, it said it did so because a lot of big companies wanted a Windows Treo. Are they going to want a Windows Pre? Palm’s WebOS looks so much more sophisticated on every front than Windows Mobile that putting WinMo on it would be like sticking a Hyundai engine in a Lamborghini. 

11. How will folks get apps? Palm is saying it’ll have an apps store. Which is clearly becoming mandatory these days. But will it cut venerable third-party software merchants such as Handango and PalmGear out of the action by setting itself up as the exclusive Pre app seller? [UPDATE: Ina Fried’s post over at CNET seems to say that Palm’s app store won’t be the sole source of programs.)

12. How reliable will it be? One of the reasons I stopped using Palm phones–I felt like a traitor–is that the last couple I owned were a little less than rock-sold. (Translation: They tended to spontaneously reboot on me.) WebOS is an uncommonly ambitious operating environment; let’s hope Palm debugs it within an inch of its life. Even if that means delaying the Pre’s release.

13. What does this mean for Android? Until now, Google’s OS has had a lock on the honor of being The Most Interesting Mobile OS That Isn’t iPhone OS. Judging from Palm’s demo yesterday, though, the Pre is a more clever piece of hardware than T-Mobile’s Android-powered G1, and WebOS sports a more imaginative user interface than Android. Google’s goals are so different from Palm’s that it’s hard to compare them: It’s building an open-source OS for use by multiple hardware partners. But you gotta wonder whether Palm will steal some of the buzz that Android now enjoys.

14. What does this mean for Palm? It’s tempting to say that Palm. Is. Back. It would also be a mistake to do so until the Pre is out and reviewers and real people have had a chance to use it. Right now, though, the odds of Palm bouncing back feel at least as good as the odds of it withering away–if it can get the Pre out. And the Pre lives up to expectations. And it’s available on multiple carriers.

Any other questions?


Read more: 

12 Comments For This Post

  1. Charles Forsythe Says:

    What is the downside of being on the Spring network? I’ve been a happy Sprint customer for years. What am I missing? 3G network?

  2. Harry McCracken Says:

    I run into some folks who are Sprint haters–sometimes because of customer service issues in the past. But in other instances, it’s just that they’re on other carriers and don’t want to switch, or wish that there was a Pre they could use overseas (sounds like there will be eventually).


  3. robinson Says:

    Wonderfully balanced report! I have read that the phone is NOT compatible with legacy Palm OS apps… what a bummer! Still, there are hopes for an emulator to run them.

    The question is how tough it will be to port old apps to the new OS.

  4. PXLated Says:

    Apple shows Palm how to do it, Palm shows Android how they should have done it 😉

  5. Relyt Says:

    Your link to cnet on #11’s update is broken (actually linking to http:///)

  6. Jay Says:

    Hey, Harry – aside from price, how about including an OBVIOUS question:


    Palm’s touting the ability to have virtually unlimited numbers of cards/apprs open simultaneously absolutely begs that single question.

    So, maybe 16 questions would have been more appropriate?

  7. Shawn Roberts Says:

    Maybe the Pre will save Sprint as well as Palm.

  8. Dave Beck Says:

    Does the lack of PalmOS compatibility mean that Access are now free to put the PalmOS emulator that runs on the Nokia tablets on Android as well? If so I’ll be an Android user for the next phone. If I had wanted an iPhone I’d have bought one.

  9. Kontra Says:

    “Pre’s introduction, website, technology packaging, industrial design, UI, product naming and positioning…down to the flow of its CES presentation were pointedly, but perhaps not surprisingly, Apple-like. Of all the current iPhone competitors, Pre clearly captures the “soul” of the iPhone as much as any product not-from-Cupertino can. Whatever Pre “borrows” from the iPhone, it does so not with the brazen indifference of recent iPhone-killers, but with care and purpose.”


    “Palm is clearly late to iPhone’s party. By the time the first Pre is sold, the iPhone will likely have 30 million users in 70+ countries, 15,000 apps, a huge developer and peripherals ecosystem, perhaps a third of the market share and 40% of smartphone revenues. And that’s before the next generation iPhone device and OS are introduced.”

    I explored Pre’s chances in:

    Strategic shortcomings of Pre in the post-iPhone era


  10. Jody Weissler Says:

    My main question is (since they are not supporting legacy apps) is to why someone would not go with the HTC Android phone? Both require purchase of news apps and there is probably more momentum for a Google Sponsored OS.

    Palm needs to support legacy apps through an emulation layer and make previous developers and users happy.

  11. Steven Sherman Says:

    i am not leaving Sprint so I will not buy an Iphone. I think Apple and AT&T should be sued. With Apple getting the patent on multi-touch I just want my phone to do the same when browsing (like Iphone) and have all of the features of the gyro from the Wii. Give me a Wii phone (from sprint) and i will be happy. 🙂 I hate palm by the way but since there is no Android phone or IPhone for Sprint I might consider it.

  12. dog house plans Says:

    this is a very nice blog very much interesting especially to all wide readers please come and visit blog often.
    dog house plans

8 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Mobile World Congress: What If the iPhone Didn’t Exist? | Technologizer Says:

    […] an imitation of the iPhone software, but brings strikingly new ideas to the table–the Palm Pre proves that. Among the touch phones I saw at MWC, many drew general inspiration from the iPhone […]

  2. The Palm Pre Revealed: The Technologizer Review | Technologizer Says:

    […] at the Consumer Electronics Show in January, Palm unveiled the Pre with one of the most startling, sexy demos in tech history. Judging from the time I spent with a Pre this week, the phone lives up to most of its considerable […]

  3. Palm OS Isn’t Dead Yet. Not Quite, Anyhow Says:

    […] end of an era–the first decade and a half or so of Palm’s existence leading up to the announcement of WebOS and the Palm Pre a year […]

  4. Palm’s Pre, Plussed: The Technologizer Review Says:

    […] operating system, WebOS, is still pretty much the same one that the company unveiled in January of 2009. Which is a compliment, not a criticism: In terms of ingenuity, elegance, and efficiency, it […]

  5. mobile-world-congress-what-if-the-iphone-didnt-e « eonly.us Says:

    […] an imitation of the iPhone software, but brings strikingly new ideas to the table–the Palm Pre proves that. Among the touch phones I saw at MWC, many drew general inspiration from the iPhone […]

  6. palm-responds-to-apple-iphone-patent-warnings « eonly.us Says:

    […] Palm. The Pre has some iPhone-like characteristics, but overall, it’s no iPhone wannabee.? It’s a strikingly imaginative device–the most inventive new phone since the first iPhone–and it would be a shame if legal […]

  7. BlackBerry Torch First Impressions: Fresh But Familiar, Indeed Says:

    […] past that it would have been riskier to stick with them than to start fresh. Hence Palm’s WebOS (a technical success even though it hasn’t yet shipped in a successful product) and […]

  8. BlackBerry Torch First Impressions: Fresh But Familiar Indeed | Enbeeone3 Says:

    […] past that it would have been riskier to stick with them than to start fresh. Hence Palm’s WebOS (a technical success even though it hasn’t yet shipped in a successful product) and […]