Windows Vista: A Review Recap

Back in late 2006 and early 2007, most appraisals of Vista were fairly kind.

By  |  Monday, October 12, 2009 at 2:48 am

CNET

“Windows Vista Ultimate,” by Robert Vamosi, January 23rd, 2007

How are the visuals? “Though video playback and, yes, even the tiny icons on Windows Vista are now crisp and colorful with Aero, unless you watch YouTube videos all day, you won’t really need Aero, nor will you miss the tiny preview windows enabled on your desktop display.”

How are performance and stability? “[E]ven Microsoft seems to admit that the best performance is only available on top-of-the-line machines manufactured within the last year or so…[A]fter testing several early builds, we found Windows Vista to be remarkably stable and robust.”

How compatible is it? “[I]f you don’t have the proper graphics hardware…you’ll simply never see the Aero graphic effects on that old Dell computer in your basement.”

How’s UAC? “You shouldn’t encounter User Account Control (UAC) except when changing system configurations or installing new software, and even then, wouldn’t you–in this age of downloadable spyware–prefer to know when an executable file is about to run? While UAC notifies you of pending system changes, it doesn’t always require a password.”

The bottom line? “Perhaps we’re spoiled, but after more than five years of development, there’s a definite ‘Is that all?’ feeling about Windows Vista/..is Windows Vista a bad operating system? No. It’s just a disappointment for PC users who hoped that Microsoft would deliver something truly exciting to finally leapfrog ahead of Apple. They failed. But stick around; this is just Windows Vista 1.0…Windows Vista SP1 promises to fix what’s known to be wrong within Windows Vista and should offer a few concrete reasons to switch.”

Forbes

“Dim Vista,” by Stephen Manes, February 26th, 2007

How are the visuals? Not addressed.

How are performance and stability? “[O]n one machine–oddly, the fastest I tested–[Quick Search] was far, far slower than using Start’s regular search option…The speech recognition system…did pretty well at understanding me…But my enthusiasm turned to dust when the software for correcting inevitable mistakes locked up repeatedly..”

How compatible is it? “Should you upgrade your current machine? Are you nuts? Upgrading is almost always a royal pain. Many older boxes are too wimpy for Vista, and a “Vista-ready” unit Microsoft upgraded for me could see my wireless network but not connect to it”

How’s UAC? “Vista’s irritating and repeated warnings about possible security breaches don’t always mean what they say and are usually irrelevant. You’ll take them as seriously as the boy who cried wolf, making them useless as defensive tools.”

The bottom line? “Vista is at best mildly annoying and at worst makes you want to rush to Redmond, Wash. and rip somebody’s liver out…My recommendation: Don’t even consider updating an old machine to Vista, period. And unless you absolutely must, don’t buy a new one with Vista until the inevitable Service Pack 1 (a.k.a. Festival o’ Fixes) arrives to combat horrors as yet unknown.”

Paul Thurrott’s Windows Supersite

“Windows Vista Review,” by Paul Thurrott, November 6th, 2006 [continued over several months in multiple posts]

How are the visuals? “Windows Aero is gorgeous, and highly customizable with varying degrees of translucency and various color schemes. Aero is one of the nicest things about running Windows Vista.”

How’s UAC? “In use, UAC can be annoying, and while you can turn off this feature from within the User Accounts control panel, I advise you not to do so. UAC’s predecessors on other systems prove the worth of this type of protection, and the truth is, you won’t really see UAC rear its ugly head all that often once your applications are all installed and your system is fully configured. The occasional minor irritation is definitely worth the peace of mind: Thanks to UAC, spyware and other malware will have a harder time silently installing themselves on your PC.”

How are performance and stability? “On reasonably modern hardware, you’ll find that Windows Vista runs just fine, thank you very much, and it’s likely that most people won’t notice any performance differences, when compared with XP, at all. On new PCs, of course, this won’t be an issue, and Windows Vista will run like the proverbial greased pig…[W]e’ll need to see how Vista performs in the real world before we render a final verdict for overall reliability. But the early signs are quite positive indeed.”

How compatible is it? “Overall, Windows Vista’s hardware and software compatibility is excellent, but the devil is in the details: For the short term, at least, chances are good that you’ll own some hardware device–a printer, scanner, or whatever–that doesn’t work properly. Software compatibility is better, much better on the 32-bit Vista versions, however. My recommendation for those contemplating 64-bit is simple: Wait.”

The bottom line? “In conclusion, Windows Vista is both evolutionary and revolutionary, and I know it’s great because every time I have to use Windows XP, I feel constrained and miss those Vista features I’m just now starting to take for granted. It’s not perfect–what software is?–but it’s a compelling and fascinating product that will delight you over time as you stumble onto new features.”

PC Magazine

“Windows Vista,” by John Clyman, January 26th, 2007

How are the visuals? “There’s no question that the Vista shell is a massive change from Windows XP…Personally, I find Aero effects subtle and compelling.”

How are performance and stability? “On the whole, my experience has been positive—on a screamer system. Others have had worse luck, particularly those who skimped on RAM.”

How compatible is it? “Vista didn’t always find drivers for all my devices during the installation process, but right after booting it connected to Windows Update to download additional drivers. Microsoft emphasizes that software and hardware compatibility work is still ongoing, though by the date of Vista’s general availability, January 30, the story should be better…With the exception of security tools and low-level utilities, virtually all of the applications I’ve run on the shipping version of Vista work fine.”

How’s UAC? “Vista’s User Account Control security feature—which requires even administrators to confirm attempts to “escalate” privileges to perform administrative tasks—can be intrusive at first. But in the long term, running Vista without administrator rights most of the time should reduce security risks.”

The bottom line? “Vista is good—in some respects very good—but not spectacular. Call it a nice-to-have product rather than a must-have. If you’re buying a new consumer PC this spring, it probably makes sense to get Vista…If you’ve already got a PC running Windows XP smoothly, it’s harder to see a reason to upgrade right away.”

«PREVIOUS PAGE 1 2 3 4  NEXT PAGE»


50 Comments


Read more: , ,

31 Comments For This Post

  1. ediedi Says:
    October 11th, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    "Most writers said to think carefully before upgrading an existing PC to Vista, but that it would be a welcome improvement over XP when acquired on a new machine." – pretty accurate in my experience.

    On a related note, Vista reviews were moderate, because they compared it to the very mature XP.

    W7 reviews are raving because they compare it to Vista. – something to take note of when forming an opinion based on reviews

  2. Muay Thai Says:
    January 4th, 2012 at 4:48 am

    Windows 7 is definitely a good upgrade, unlike Vista was… Muay Thai | Muay Thai Kick | Martial Arts for Children.

  3. Steve Wildstrom Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 6:23 am

    As I wrap up another Win 7 column, thanks for reminding me that I was reasonably prescient about Vista. I would have been tougher on UAC, but I really thought Microsoft would fix it quickly. Actually, I should not have been surprised that they didn’t since I had been telling them how much it sucked since beta 1 to no effect whatever.

  4. oldtaku Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 10:12 am

    Well just look at that list of book and magazine whores. Of course they’d be all enthusiastic about Vista so they can publish a whole new set of ‘how to make this not suck’ articles and books. I don’t trust their Win7 reviews either – which is fine, because you can try it yourself before buying.

  5. P Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 10:16 am

    One thing I note that never gets mentioned…user interface changes that affect the normal productivity as one needs to get used to and figure out how to use. Just as productivity challenges exist in Office 2007, such is the OS as well.

    This is only exacerbated by MS getting it wrong and then having to fix soon there after–and I think this is one of the reasons business is slow to change.

  6. zato Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 10:29 am

    “Did any of the reviews predict widespread dislike of and/or disinterest in Vista, or guess that it would never become the dominant version of the OS? No, and that’s OK: The point of a product review isn’t to predict how the marketplace will react.”

    All reviewers work for Microsoft. Their job is to fool the suckers into buying / preserve the monoply at all cost..

    “Only Forbes’ Manes was extremely negative, period. (His piece, the last he’s written for Forbes to date,”

    This is what happens when you go against Ballmer. RIP Mr. Manes.

  7. Harry McCracken Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    “All reviewers work for Microsoft. Their job is to fool the suckers into buying / preserve the monoply at all cost..”

    The “all reviewers work for Microsoft” meme was always grounded in conspiracy theory rather than truth, but it seems especially removed from reality in 2009. Much coverage of Microsoft is profoundly negative. And the monopolies are all in decline.

    “This is what happens when you go against Ballmer. RIP Mr. Manes.”

    Steve’s fine–he just decided to take a break from tech writing…

    –Harry

  8. david Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    interesting findings. now do the same for mac os x 10.6 snow leopard. very weird that all of the apple-loving pundits (including mossberg pogue macworld) made no mention of the crippling bugs this ‘finely tuned’ os is filled with. only place that has addressed the bugs, or solutions, is oddly enough ilounge… a site that doesn’t cover mac very often. look at all the comments, and the people thrilled with the solutions. is the reviewing media failing us?

    http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/problems-with-mac-os-x-10.6-snow-leopard-join-the-sizable-minority/
    http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/two-proposed-solutions-to-snow-leopard-crash-problems-on-macs/

  9. Rob Pegoraro Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Thanks for writing this–it persuaded me to re-read the review I did of Vista in the Washington Post back in 2007. To sum that piece up:

    * I was lukewarm overall about Vista.

    * I had no idea so many users would hate Vista. Mind you, I don’t like XP and was glad to see Vista improve a few things about XP that have bugged me, such as Windows Explorer’s default interface.

    * I did note performance and compatibility issues but grossly underestimated how long the second category of problems would persist. It amazes me how apathetic some Windows developers have been about tweaking their apps to work in Vista when so many Mac developers have rewritten their software twice in this decade (once for the OS 9-to-OS X transition, once for PowerPC-to-Intel).

    * I called UAC a “constant barrage of nags… a disaster in the making.” That last part may have been too negative, as UAC doesn’t seem to have made Vista less secure in practice.

    * I counseled against upgrading from XP but wrote that on a new machine with enough processor/memory/graphics resources, Vista represented an advance from XP. I still think that, but I suppose I’m in the minority on this point.

    In looking over my 2007 review, I also see that I placed way too much value in the applets bundled with Vista, inasmuch as Microsoft has yanked most of them from 7. And I didn’t even think to mention compatibility issues with 64-bit Vista, a topic that now takes up a non-trivial amount of my reader e-mail.

    – RP

  10. zato Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    “but it seems especially removed from reality in 2009. Much coverage of Microsoft is profoundly negative. And the monopolies are all in decline.”

    That’s a good one, Harry. The 2 top ads on this page are from Microsoft, (Bing and Win Mobile) and are probably the only real paying ads. Tell us how much of Technologizers’ monthly income is from Microsoft. My guess is 70%. You work for Microsoft. And it’s no different anywhere else you go in the tech internet, You know what Microsoft wants for their money, and you supply it.

  11. Harry McCracken Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    Hey, Zato, your analysis of Technologizer’s revenue stream is not only wildly, wildly, WILDLY off–like, everything about it is utterly inaccurate other than the fact you saw some Microsoft ads–but just plain silly. If you’re going to fabricate an estimate of the situation based on, well, no knowledge whatsoever and a willful disregard of this site’s content, why stop at estimating that 70 percent of the site’s revenue comes from Microsoft? Why not 80 percent, or 90 percent, or 100%? Wouldn’t that be better proof of your thesis?

    Actually, why not hazard a guess that Microsoft is paying me off in gold-plated Ferraris, driven to my door by Steve Ballmer himself? Or that “David Pogue” and “Walt Mossberg” are Betty Crocker-like characters created by Microsoft’s corporate communications team? It’s only a little less accurate than your guestimate, and a lot more fun!

    –Harry

  12. Ric Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Whats going to be funny is how Win7 will be an overwhelming success by comparison to Vista as it will just blow its sales and adoption figures out of the water, which is an effortless non-achievement. M$ will toot its horn loud and proud too! I have a Vista machine that I love the hardware but detest the OS and I am going to Win7 as a freebie upgrade. I wouldnt do 7 if it werent free and you best believe I will count in the stats for adoption and perhaps even sales (you know they will be fudged!) But the most telling fact of my story is I have XP Pro standing by in the wings ready to reformat the machine at the slightest Win7 terminal error. I lived without Vista and if 7 sucks I can live without it too.

  13. zato Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    “Why not 80 percent”
    Wow! I swear I was going to say 80%…

  14. zato Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    “Actually, why not hazard a guess that Microsoft is paying me off in gold-plated Ferraris, driven to my door by Steve Ballmer himself?”

    Quit joking, Harry. You’d have to be Pogue, Mossberg, Levy, or Ihnatko to get the Ferrari. A Harry McCracken is more like Geo Metro territory.

  15. tripleman Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    Funny, David, I’ve been running 10.6 since it came out and have had no problems – let alone “crippling” ones.

    I’m constantly running intensive graphics apps (practically the whole Adobe Suite) almost all the time as well as the browser, mail, etc.. and still have no issues.

    The system is a little faster, smaller and more stable. Not bad for a $35CDN upgrade.

  16. Harold Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    Windows Vista is absolute crapola!! A couple of tech guys I trust have told me that win7 is a decent, clean and strong OS and a big improvement over Vista. However they still are recommending XP over both until win7 SP1. But it may be too late for me. The frustration I experienced with Vista “forced” me to download UBUNTU via the wubi virtual partition on my OS. I estimate that I now run the UBUNTU OS about 35% of the time and when I figure out the WINE app, UBUNTU will most likely be my primary OS. I loved XP. Why Microsoft did not build upon XP’s success is a mystery to just about everyone that us/used to run it.

  17. Steve Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    It is fun to look back at the reviews now to see who was able to call it like it is and who's head was stuck in Microsoft's posterior. The two extremes would be Stephen Manes and Paul Thurrott. Paul's review is a real gem that simply defines Windows zealotry. Not surprisingly the mainstream media all took an approach somewhere in between – how safe…

  18. heulenwolf Says:
    October 13th, 2009 at 7:47 am

    Good work, Harry. Reviews are often treated too much like news – only good for the moment and then forgotten. I think they should stand alone and, as you have done, be reviewed themselves.

    I’d even like to see more reviews of products after they’ve been out for a while, like CNet’s Road Tests on the Real Deal podcast, only more formal. I think most consumers wait until something forces or shocks them to change (e.g. Sidekick fiasco) rather than switching products when the latest thing comes out. I’d like to see how a product fares after significant use.

    There are differences between a reviewer’s perspective and a customer’s perspective that we should take into account when reading. For example, many reviewers have been constantly changing systems they use – whether it be the cell phone, computer, OS, or whatever is being reviewed – and are used to the upheaval. I think many folks reacted more negatively to Vista than reviews predicted because we hadn’t had any Windows OS upgrades to perform in 7 years (Win98/ME/NT/2K->XP). In fact, it had been so long between OS releases that many users had never been through an upgrade when Vista came along. Their entire computing experience had been on XP. The fact that the Vista upgrade process went drastically smoother than many prior Windows upgrades was lost on these users. We had forgotten that there is always something we’re giving up to move forward; its always painful. Sure, reviewers should try to take this difference in perspective into account but they can’t speak for everyone.

  19. sfmitch Says:
    October 13th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    Steve Wildstrom Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 6:23 am
    As I wrap up another Win 7 column, thanks for reminding me that I was reasonably prescient about Vista. I would have been tougher on UAC, but I really thought Microsoft would fix it quickly. Actually, I should not have been surprised that they didn’t since I had been telling them how much it sucked since beta 1 to no effect whatever.

    Steve – you mean how reasonably prescient you were by ending the review by saying “And Vista is a big step forward; in time, you’ll want it.”

    You may want to stop patting yourself on the back, your review was overall quite complimentary to Vista and just warned about upgrading an existing XP PC rather than going out and buying a Vista Loaded PC (good advice, BTW (not being sarcastic)).

    Vista was a dog and still is a dog. For so many companies and individuals to go out of their way (and often pay more) to stick with an 8 year old OS speaks volumes about how bad Vista is.

  20. Bruce Says:
    October 14th, 2009 at 12:09 am

    This is a great post. More reviewers should go back and see how their predictions ended up when they encountered reality. 😉

    My only extensive experience with Vista was when I was in Japan for a week using a borrowed laptop (mine was lost in transit). I was never sure if the problems were because the interface was in Japan or because it was Vista.

  21. Bill Baker Says:
    October 14th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Harry:

    Great piece. I thought you might appreciate a post on my personal blog from October 2006. Since I am generally incapable of predicting what I am going to have for lunch, I am bit proud of this one:

    http://bakercg.typepad.com/baker/2006/10/windows_vista_w.html

  22. Grapemanca Says:
    October 15th, 2009 at 11:46 am

    Having used 3 different machines with Vista, I can honestly say that I’ve had very few problems. Vista is smooth and fast, and has been much more stable than XP (esp. before XP’s SP2). In the past 2 years, I’ve only had 1 BSOD with Vista, and that was during my efforts to delete the wretched Office 2007 trial edition from my daughter’s HP laptop (which now runs great sans bloatware). Most of the Vista haters I know are Mac types who’ve never tried it, or are XP people who are outraged that Vista wouldn’t run on their old P4. Or, they are newbies who’ve bought a new laptop and blame Vista for all of the bloatware added to the machine by the manufacturer.

    In any case, I’ve now moved to Windows 7 – our business has been using it for a month – and I see very little difference between it and the 2 Vista machines I’m still using at home. It’s fast and stable, but then so was Vista. Some of the desktop refinements are nice, but not much of a help, to be honest. The best desktop app I’ve added recently is Fences 1.0, which has nothing to do with Vista or W7.

    When I read all the anti-Vista shrillness, all I can do is shrug my shoulders. What can I say? Vista has been good to me, and nothing like my brief but nightmarish experience with ME.

  23. uruiamme Says:
    October 15th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    Vista boosted both interest in Linux (see above comment), sales of Macs (great ad campaign) and kept a lot of service technicians in business. A new OS from Microsoft is like a Stimulus Plan for the tech sector… including publishers, ad agencies, software, hardware… you name it. Been watching it since the 90s and it’s always a chore to figure it out until it’s too late.

    Oh, and for Zato, come on. Ads are so… 1999. I have been blocking them with Squid and now with ADP (AdBlock Plus) since that time. But you made me look, so thanks for the laugh. My page has a mysterious blank section at the top. I figured this was the best for me and the world, since I decided not to click on ads since 97 anyway. See http://www.useit.com/alertbox/sitemaps.html for more on why I don’t look at ads even when they’re on my screen.

    Back to the peanut gallery I go.

  24. yhwebcn Says:
    August 10th, 2010 at 1:19 am

    So that every customer can buy the rest assured that with the peace of mind! Your satisfaction is my greatest joy! Either give it away or bring their own are a good choice!Replica Swiss Chronomat Watch
    Breitling Evolution Watches
    In order to meet their own pursuit of the watch, although the top watch can not afford this life,Replica Swiss Montbrillant Watch
    Replica Swiss Navitimer Watch
    Replica Swiss Superocean Watch
    and a few pieces, but can buy high quality imitation table … reason to believe that a different way of life for those who desire for the urban population power with lore.

  25. yhwebcn Says:
    August 10th, 2010 at 1:19 am

    please come here, we are lowest price replica Watches supplier,
    Royal Oak Offshore Watches
    Replica Riviera Watches
    offer high-class fake Watches in about 100 famous brands。Watch the quality is good and my hands the final say, the buyer's evaluation of the quality of the watch is the most objective evaluation.Replica Breguet Type XX Watches
    Allows you to truly experience the fun of online shopping, and that one of the baby's expectations.Audemars Piguet Jules Audemars Watches
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Watches
    Welcome customers to patronize, to buy more discount more than the price the same product we; the same price we are more than quality;the same quality service site that we were honest promise:Quality assurance; customer first; credit management,Avenger Skyland

  26. yhwebcn Says:
    August 10th, 2010 at 1:19 am

    Watch is an accessory, only one person should not be:
    50 Fathoms Watches

    Breguet Classique Tourbillon Watches
    the pursuit of quality of life of people now have become a mainstream,
    Bell & Ross Watches Accessories
    BR 01 – Instrument 46mm Watches
    from the exterior to the movement of people everywhere to work are moving fine.so more and more customers will buy a few watches to match different to clothing differently occasions,
    BR 02 – Instrument 44mm Watches
    such as have to watch while swimming at a business dinner to watch and definitely not one to wear light-colored shirt and suit T shirt to watch the same can not, therefore, essentially, the watch is a work of art,
    BR 03 – Instrument 42mm Watches
    Breitling Accessories Watches

  27. Modano267 Says:
    April 19th, 2011 at 9:31 am

    Movie site – New movies here.

  28. Arrillepe Says:
    April 21st, 2011 at 9:06 pm

    radio signal internet
    my e-mail site
    tioga il phone numbers
    vera bradley petal pink phone case
    sirius online tuner
    re-install norton internet security 2009
    phone number florida labor board
    early morning phone cal zac maloy
    dress cheap discount
    grateful dead official site
    fiche technique clio chippie diesel 1994
    very cheap coogi clothing
    iphone vs blackberry reviews web browsing
    oxford georgia phone directory
    comments on charlottes web

  29. Mike Says:
    April 29th, 2011 at 9:50 pm

    Up Microsoft's posterior? That's not possible. Microsoft is not a company that lends itself to those who would attempt such manipulations.

  30. Merry Says:
    June 4th, 2011 at 1:40 am

    Hefty hardware requirements , that's all I have to say for vista.

    window replacement cost estimator

  31. Yahya Says:
    November 20th, 2011 at 10:51 am

    I visited this page first time and found it Very Good Job of acknowledgment and a marvelous source of info………Thanks Admin! Phone Lookup
    Reverse Phone Lookup

19 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Idiot of the day | Technovia Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    […] it’s from the normally-reliableMr Gruber: “(There seems to be widespread consensus that Windows 7 has to be a hit because Microsoft […]

  2. Windows Vista Was Awesome, Don’t You Remember? | Gizmodo Australia Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    […] funny thing about Windows Vista is that the vast majority of launch reviews were really positive, just like the current ones for Windows 7, before it turned into an object of […]

  3. Windows Vista Was Awesome, Don’t You Remember? [Windows] | Techchill.com Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    […] funny thing about Windows Vista is that the vast majority of launch reviews were really positive, just like the current ones for Windows 7, before it turned into an object of […]

  4. Windows Vista: A Review Recap | Technologizer | All about windows 7 Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    […] more here:  Windows Vista: A Review Recap | Technologizer This entry was posted by admin and posted on October 12, 2009 at 9:48 am and filed under Windows […]

  5. Harry McCracken Revisits the Reviews of Vista « Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    […] Original source : https://www.technologizer.com/2009/10/12/windows-vista-… […]

  6. Harry McCracken が Windows Vista を再チェック « maclalala:link Says:
    October 12th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    […] Windows Vista: A Review Recap | Technologizer 〈Harry McCracken が Windows Vista のレビューを再チェックする〉 […]

  7. Top Posts « WordPress.com Says:
    October 13th, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    […] Windows Vista: A Review Recap Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer isn’t so sure about how folks are going to respond to Windows 7. As Mary-Jo Foley […] […]

  8. Ed Bott’s Microsoft Report mobile edition Says:
    October 14th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    […] has put together a retrospective of those Vista reviews from late 2006 and early 2007 that’s well worth reading, and he closes his analysis with a warning about the need to postpone judgment until the product […]

  9. Windows 7 in the real world: 10 PCs under the microscope - Windows 7 Center Forums Says:
    October 15th, 2009 at 4:55 am

    […] […]

  10. One Bit | Monday Note Says:
    October 19th, 2009 at 12:10 am

    […] Sages have already offered their obligatory contributions to each part of the libretto. And, things on the Web being immortal, wags have dug up equally authoritative 2 1/2 years-old claims from the same business and tech gurus when Vista was launched. Said wags invented a term, “claim chowder”, for such an amusing or embarrassing confrontation between past and present pronouncements. If you google the phrase, you won’t get much because the ever-obliging search engine thinks you mean New England’s “clam chowder”. Fortunately, Google Reader, the blog-reading engine, is more forthcoming and offers a bevy of examples such as this one, or this one. […]

  11. Gary Marshall: Can you trust experts’ opinions on Windows 7? | Midjam.info Says:
    October 20th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    […] thing is, if you go back in time and see what the same experts said about Vista – as Harry McCracken did the other day – you’ll find them saying pretty much the same thing. Best Windows ever, the pundits […]

  12. Zumo Blog: Tecnologia. Opinião. Inteligência. » Windows: isso que deu fazer barulho no supermercado Says:
    October 22nd, 2009 at 4:45 am

    […] mais gente lembrou por aí, as expectativas em torno do Vista também eram grandes e, no fim das contas, foi um fiasco.Se acho […]

  13. Perché conviene passare a Windows 7 (e perché no) - Hitech e Scienza - Panorama.it Says:
    October 22nd, 2009 at 8:14 am

    […] Solo il tempo, infatti, potrà darci un quadro del valore reale di Windows 7. Tutto sommato, se andiamo a riguardare fra gli archivi, non erano molti quelli che all’esordio di Vista avevano pronosticato un simile […]

  14. Incredible Vehicle · Fascinating times ahead Says:
    October 23rd, 2009 at 9:40 am

    […] reviews. (Hang on a second! What kind of reviews did Vista get? As it turns out, most reviews were quite favorable, esp. relative to how poorly it […]

  15. AutoBlog » 5 O’Clock Roundup: Amazon’s all-time high, Microsoft’s ignorable low, the Windows 7 questions no one but David Pogue wants to be seen answering Says:
    October 24th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    […] pundits who trash-talk Windows Vista, former PC World editor Harry McCracken looked up all of the major reviewers’ write-ups of Vista from its debut days. All but one liked it. None forecast the sprawling, deep disinterest with which […]

  16. The State of Windows 7 Satisfaction | Technologizer Says:
    November 30th, 2009 at 12:43 am

    […] I’ve written before, there’s no such thing as an operating system upgrade that doesn’t cause headaches for […]

  17. Microsoft lance Windows 7 pour redresser la barre « La gazette de puteaux Says:
    April 13th, 2010 at 9:37 am

    […] […]

  18. La gazette de puteaux Says:
    April 13th, 2010 at 9:42 am

    […] […]

  19. Enginemicro's news » The State of Windows 7 Satisfaction Says:
    March 13th, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    […] I’ve written before, there’s no such thing as an operating system upgrade that doesn’t cause headaches for […]