By Jared Newman | Sunday, June 20, 2010 at 1:51 pm
On the opposite side of the Los Angeles Convention Center from OnLive’s glitzy E3 booth, Dave Perry held a small briefing in a cubicle to talk about his own cloud gaming service, Gaikai.
Perry wanted to clarify that Gaikai is “the ultimate lead ever for a publisher,” as opposed to a full-blown gaming service for consumers. He’s positioning Gaikai as a try before you buy service, kind of like the InstantAction service that debuted in April, but with all the heavy graphics processing done on remote servers, allowing for immediate access to the latest PC games. The idea is to let publishers, and eventually gaming websites, embed video games directly into the browser, so readers can instantly try the game instead of watching trailers or looking at screenshots.
This stands in stark contrast to OnLive, which on Thursday launched its subscription service. Though OnLive subscribers can play demos for free, the service is less of a promotional tool for publishers and more of a final stop for gamers who have committed to spending money.
In my meetings with OnLive and Gaikai, each company displayed a gentle animosity toward the other. Perry said his data centers are going to “end up in rings around [OnLive’s],” and claimed that each of his servers can run many more virtualizations. He also questioned OnLive’s subscription model; Gaikai won’t charge anything to consumers, and will instead charge publishers, likening server time to advertising.
OnLive’s director of games and media development, Joe Bentley, said he has yet to see Gaikai in action. Though Perry showed embedded streaming games — along with software such as Adobe Photoshop — on a PC and an Xbox 360, the server was in the same room. OnLive’s E3 demos were running on a server in Silicon Valley.
My problem with Gaikai is the disconnect between trying a game and buying it. Let’s say you play the first 20 minutes of a game through your Web browser and are persuaded to buy. Then what? Do you start a lengthy download through Steam? Run to GameStop to buy the boxed version? The ideal solution would be a full cloud gaming service that players could easily jump to once their trials end, because once you’ve experienced instant gratification, it’s hard to go back.
That’s why I think Gaikai’s advertising service and OnLive’s subscription package would work wonderfully together, if only they could stop sniping at each other.
[…] them while they’re downloading. The latter service was likely to be overshadowed anyway by Gaikai, which streams games as compressed video from remote servers (similar to OnLive, but with an […]
[…] them while they’re downloading. The latter service was likely to be overshadowed anyway by Gaikai, which streams games as compressed video from remote servers (similar to OnLive, but with an […]
[…] for Gaikai’s business model, I’m still concerned about the disconnect between playing a game instantly over the web and then being required to […]
June 21st, 2010 at 3:58 am
what if u could at least keep playing in gaikai till your download finished, then you could save your current game and open it in the newly installed version?
June 21st, 2010 at 4:45 am
Harry, would you ever use a gaming streaming service? And if you would, what games would you use it for?
My guess is primarily casual games. Most prospects of this service are casual/fun games users anyway. So my question is: if the only thing you play is lightweight games without intense graphics, why use a service that’s only made to offer intense graphics without the need of a lot of horsepower?
The games this solution is suitable for (intense games like crysis and Battlefield) are nowhere near the interests of the services potential customers. And even if it were, I think these services would have a VERY hard time turning a profit if all of there customers require enough horsepower to play crysis. (as I pointed out in previous posts)
That is why I still think these services are doomed from the start. And so far, nobody has even begun to try to convince me of the opposite (showing a demo with a few devices does not convince me you can pull it off with thousands of users!)
June 21st, 2010 at 11:48 am
The only reason I would get On-live is if it had a lot of Good PC exclusive games.(My PC is crap) All the games I currently see listed as playable are available for my Xbox 360.