KaChing Becomes Wealthfront

By  |  Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 1:00 pm

One year ago, I wrote about KaChing, an investment site that aimed to provide a better option than mutual funds for small investors, by letting them map their portfolios to the investment strategies of expert professional investors and talented amateurs. It was an intriguing idea, but I wondered how many real people would be comfortable entrusting their savings to a startup with a silly name, not to mention relying on the advice of finance hobbyists rather than pros.

Well, KaChing is relaunching today. It’s now called Wealthfront, and it’s phasing out the amateur advice in favor of a roster consisting entirely of professional money managers. It turns out that its founders decided that sounding a bit more serious and less seat-of-the-pants was a good idea.

Speaking of serious, the minimum amount new members need to invest is now $10,000, up from $3,000. (Founder Dan Carroll told me that the smallest investors tended to be in it in search of a quick payoff, which is just a bad idea.) And besides adding more professional managers, the site is also adding a questionnaire that aims to help investors build a portfolio that matches their goals. (KaChing was centered around a toteboard of managers ranked by “Investment IQ” and didn’t do as much to help new members allot their monies wisely.)

The basic idea behind the site hasn’t changed that much: It’s still based on the theory that actively-managed mutual funds have a lousy track record of outperforming the stock market, charge too much in fees, and hide their performance numbers. Wealthfront wants to give little investors access to the same strategies followed by the people in charge Ivy League endowments and other big-time types. (It even lets us non-tycoons invest in a hedge fund.) And it has numbers showing its managers beating the S&P 500 over the past year and past five years.

As before, members’ money is really held in an investment account that isn’t controlled by Wealthfront; if the company were to go belly-up, the only thing you’d lose was the ability to have your money automatically map itself to the Wealthfront managers’ portfolios of investments.

When I wrote about KaChing last year, I said I was tempted to try it myself. I never did–but the changes make the proposition more tempting.


Read more: , ,

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Lee Says:

    You should have tried it a year ago, that's when I invested. Return to date: 39.6% with Dennes Lupastean. I actually don't like the way they have changed it since I started. You can't even find my investment manager on the front page anymore because now they are advertising their more professional managers, but they don't provide the returns that some of the smaller guys do.

  2. Ford Palmeter Says:

    Thanks Lee for the info. I just joined and hope that it is easy to review all the managers. I will take a look at Dennes Lupastean as well. Ford

  3. iphone 5 Says:

    What a great service to be able to purchase. A site that actually gives you detailed information on financial strategies used by big investment names. I never thought mutual funds were a great investment especially with the high associated fees.