Tag Archives | iPhone

iPhone Rumors: Vague, Very Vague!

att_header_logoPhone gossip/rumor/scuttlebutt/leak kingpin Boy Genius has a post at his site reporting on what an AT&T exec is supposedly saying about the next generation iPhone. BG says the tidbits he’s reporting are 100% confirmed. But they’re also, well, 100% obvious:

  • There will be a new iPhone announcement around mid-June (logical enough–Apple’s Phil Schiller openly told the New York Times’ David Pogue that Apple tries to follow a June release schedule for the iPhone);
  • “New iPhone will be faster and have a more seamless experience” (it would be startling if Apple didn’t put a speedier chip in the new phone, and with features such as cut and paste, the iPhone 3.0 OS qualifies as being a whole lot more seamless);
  • AT&T will release an iPhone client for its U-Verse broadband TV/DVR service (the company has said it’s working on one, and I’ve gotten a glimpse of it running on an iPhone myself);
  • It’s “becoming a tradition” to release iPhones on an annual schedule (you think?)
  • This Summer will be exciting!
  • AT&T is working with Apple to create a unified experience across its platforms (a good U-Verse client for the iPhone will certainly qualify as that);
  • iPhone 3.0 shows where the iPhone is going (pretty much by definition, surely);
  • People should pick their AT&T phone based on personal preferences, not features (Boy Genius then starts talking about an iPhone with a slide-out keyboard, but I think he’s riffing rather than predicting or speculating);
  • Higher-speed HSDPA Internet access is being “hinted” at.

Boy Genius himself–who isn’t always right, but who unquestionably has some great sources within big companies–says that some of this stuff is not news. Despite his promise of 100% confirmation, I’m not assuming it’s all going to come true, either–the new iPhone’s schedule could slip, or it could turn out to be no faster than today’s model. Here’s hoping that the next iPhone, whatever it is, is worthy of gossip that’s more scintillating than this–in other words, that it’s something more than an iPhone 3G that’s a little thinner, a little sexier, a little faster, a little cheaper, and preloaded with the 3.0 software…

13 comments

Apple Bids Adieu To Bluetooth Headset

iphone-bluetooth-headsetThe Cupertino company quietly discontinued its in-house Bluetooth headset, according to Apple Store watchers. The product has been labeled as such since Saturday. It is still for sale, however.

It’s not clear why the headset is being discontinued, and there are several completely logical reasons why this happened. First could be a move to clear old stock for a refresh to the iPhone lineup expected by many later this year.

Another possibility is Apple may be exiting the accessory market altogether in an effort to focus on the phones themselves. With increased competition enroute from devices like the Palm Pre, Cupertino will have its hands full. Makes sense.

There’s not much evidence either that the device ever actually sold very well. It’s initial selling price of $129 in 2007 was rather steep, and Apple actually reduced the price the following year to $99.

It’s also been criticized by some for poor battery life and range, and a lack of voice activated dialing.

There’s also a third rumor, which AppleInsider is pushing (although they are not confirming it yet): there may have been some type of recall. Apple has reportedly been recalling existing inventory, but has not given any reasoning.

Why they may be doing that is not known. Either way, it’s bye-bye to the Apple Bluetooth Headset. I don’t know, but I would have probably opted for a cheaper alternative anyway if I would have needed one.

No comments

5Words for March 20th, 2009

Lotsa iPhone-related news today:5words

Gmail gets undo send. Kinda.

SpiralFrog free music service folds.

Google removes Street View images.

“$500 Mac tax” helps Microsoft?

Nokia E71x hits AT&T stores

SanDisk player includes 1000 songs.

Palm: More WebOS phones someday.

Nintendo creating an app store?

iPhone Moviefone! (Moviefone’s still around?)

Magic tricks for your iPhone.

Now TomTom’s suing Microsoft back.

iPhone 3G speed lawsuit filed.

Apple’s intentionally stoking iPhone gossip?

No comments

iPhone Games? Sony's Not Worried

livefire1Oh, Peter Dille. The Sony Senior VP of Marketing has a great acid tongue (he recently said game publishers want to “sell razor blades” while Sony shoulders the net loss on console sales), but his latest attempt to bolster the Playstation Portable in the face of the iPhone is off the mark.

Dille said Sony’s not worried about the iPhone’s potential as a gaming device, calling Apple’s game support a “seperate business.”

“The iPhone games and apps are largely diversionary, whereas we’re a gaming company and we make games for people who want to carry a gaming device and play a game that offers a satisfying 20+ hours of gameplay,” he said in an interview with GameDaily.

It’s not clear whether the interview happened before or after Apple unveiled iPhone’s 3.0 operating system, complete with micro-transaction support to the delight of publishers, but I wonder if Dille is singing a different tune now. Downloadable content isn’t necessarily the key to 20-hour gaming — us hardcore players used to get along fine without it — but it’s an indicator of where the iPhone is headed as a games machine.

See, for example, LiveFire, a first-person shooter in development for the iPhone that will offer additional weapons for purchase. If an online shoot-em-up with voice chat isn’t an example of complex, non-“diversionary” gaming, I don’t know what is.

And besides, what’s the harm in supporting simpler games as well? Sony and Microsoft were quick to regard the Wii as a non-competitor, and look where that got them. If I were Sony, I’d be coming up with a strategy to beat the iPhone — and perhaps the company is doing so, and Dille’s comments are just posturing — instead of ignoring it.

15 comments

5Words for March 19th, 2009

5words Like news? You’ll LOVE these!

Gizmodo tests WiMax, likes it.

Cisco flips for the Flip.

Hacker compromises Mac in seconds.

New features in Silverlight 3.

Sirius founder: Sirius is doomed.

New iPhone clues in beta?

Steve Ballmer’s still courting Yahoo.

Random rumor: OLED Macs, iPhones.

Dell’s Adamo notebook on sale.

iPhone tethering seems to work.

Sprint roadmap: Pre, other phones.

Mobile Firefox now in beta.

No comments

Would You Pay $699 For an iPhone?

iPhoneGood news, sort of: Boy Genius Report is reporting that AT&T is about to start selling iPhones 3Gs that don’t require signing a contract, an option which it said it was going to get around to offering all along. They won’t come cheap, though: Folks who are willing to sign two-year contracts can get an 8GB iPhone 3G for $199 or a 16GB one for $299, but the same phones sans contract will apparently be $599 and $699 respectively.

Of course, those prices have a tinge of deja vu to them–when the original iPhone was announced in January of 2007, an 8GB one went for…$599. (The 4GB model was $499, and 16GB iPhones didn’t yet exist.) But that $599 8GB iPhone required a two-year contract, and was a distinctly lesser handset–no 3G broadband, no GPS, and no third-party apps. Today’ $599 iPhone is a better device with fewer strings attached.

But it isn’t really commitment-free, since it’s still locked to AT&T, and apparently only existing AT&T customers will be able to get one–and only one per line. Unless you’re planning to unlock your phone without anyone’s approval, you’re still effectively agreeing to remain an AT&T customer–and therefore turn over $1400 for service over the next two years, in all likelihood–until such time as AT&T and Apple decide it’s okay to unlock iPhones.

(And I’m still unsure why they object to the practice, if consumers are willing to pay an unsubsidized price. I’ve bought several other models of phone from AT&T at full price because the company would cheerfully unlock them if I asked; just what makes the so that’s different?)

Of course, Apple does sell unlocked, truly commitmentless iPhones in countries where it’s required to do so. When I was in Spain last month, I saw an unlocked 16GB iPhone 3G for 799 Euros, or $1075 U.S, at an airport electronics shop. My buying advice is simple: YOU’D BE NUTS TO SPEND OVER A THOUSAND DOLLARS ON AN IPHONE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN A NEW MODEL IS LIKELY JUST MONTHS AWAY!!! (Whew.)

Anyhow, I might consider a $599 iPhone 3G if I could unlock it without fear of technical glitches or reprisal from Apple–I just hate contracts, and travel overseas enough that the idea of being able to pop in a cheap local SIM is mighty appealing. But I’d wait until June or so to see what Apple has waiting in the wings. And I’m guessing it isn’t a given that any new iPhones will be immediately available at an unsubsidized price.

I feel a T-Poll coming on…

No comments

5Words for March 18th, 2009

5wordsHere’s what I’m reading this morning:

Google Chrome: In beta! Again!

Big Blue to buy Sun?

Palm Pre vs. iPhone.

Jailbreakers dive into iPhone 3.0.

Fujitsu sells a color e-reader.

More hot water for Kindle.

Watch your mouth on Twitter.

Privacy group wants Google investigated.

McCain Twitter interview: kinda lame.

A $132 PC, sort of.

Psystar introduces another Mac clone.

Early TV digital transition list.

One comment

iPhone vs. Palm Pre: It's Still War!

Hulk HoganGoing into this morning’s Apple iPhone 3.0 unveiling, one of the biggest questions of the year in the world of tech was how Palm’s upcoming Pre phone would stack up against the iPhone. The Pre looks like it’ll be the most interesting and imaginative new smartphone to date that isn’t an iPhone, and the only one with a software platform that has a shot at out-innovating Apple. (I have high hopes for Google’s Android over the long haul, but if that OS changes everything, it’ll have to do it on a handset that’s more groundbreaking than T-Mobile’s G1.)

Now that we have a better sense of the iPhone software that the Pre will compete with when it shows up–I’m guessing that the Pre’s planned launch time frame of the first half of the year and iPhone 3.0’s summer release will result in both showing up around the same time–it still looks like the competition between the two phones will be fierce and fun.

Continue Reading →

23 comments

A Hundred New iPhone 3.0 Features? Let's Count 'em!

iPhone Features

One of the oft-repeated mantras at this morning’s iPhone 3.0 event was that the new software has over a hundred new features–a claim that Apple repeats on its still-sparse iPhone 3.0 info page. I think there’s a good chance that the company will eventually enumerate them, since it says that Leopard has 300+ new features and then meticulously accounts for them.

But I got to wondering: Just how many features did Apple tell us about this morning? Was it all of them? And if it skipped any, was it because they were too boring and/or arcane to merit discussion? Or could it be holding back anything unspeakably wonderful to tell us about at the last moment?

Continue Reading →

42 comments

The Curious Case of iPhone 3.0

Scott ForstallCall it the Benjamin Button school of software development. When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone at Macworld Expo San Francisco 2007, it already sported a user interface so highly-evolved that it hardly felt like a 1.0 release–it looked more like the result of years of refinement. But for all of the iPhone OS’s initial maturity, it was missing a laundry list of basic features that other handheld platforms usually have pretty much from birth. Stuff like cut and paste, MMS, search tools. and the ability to handle at least some tasks in the background. Oh, and the ability to run third-party applications at all.

Last year’s iPhone 2.0 update was mostly about supporting third party apps. And today’s iPhone 3.0–which, incidentally, I guest-blogged about for Laptop in a post about the biggest new features–is largely about the baby steps that other platforms would have taken at inception. In other words, the iPhone’s operating system is doing something I can’t remember any software doing: It’s aging backwards.

Continue Reading →

12 comments