Firefox 3.5: The Technologizer Review

The browser that reignited the browser wars is back--and still the most well-rounded one around.

By  |  Tuesday, June 30, 2009 at 4:06 am

firefoxreviewWas it really fewer than five years ago that Firefox 1.0 debuted? Its arrival ended the dismal period in which only one browser–Microsoft’s mediocre Internet Explorer–seemed to be viable. With Firefox, Mozilla proved that millions of people were itching to adopt a better browser. And today, we find ourselves with multiple better browsers:  Not just Firefox, but also Google’s minimalist Chrome, Apple’s flashy Safari, the ever-inventive Opera, the highly social Flock, and even the no-longer-calcifying Internet Explorer 8.

All of which means that Firefox 3.5–which Mozilla plans to formally release today–is no longer a shoo-in for the distinction of being the favorite browser of browser fans. (As I write, Firefox 3.5 hasn’t replaced 3.0 yet on the Firefox home page, but the Windows and Mac versions are live on Mozilla’s FTP site.)

After having spent months with various pre-release versions of 3.5, though, I’m convinced that The Little Browser That Could remains the best choice for the widest array of folks. That’s as much for the virtues that Firefox has possessed for years as for new stuff: Version 3.5′ s improvements are about better speed, useful tweaks to existing features, catchup with other browsers, and early support for emerging Web standards. In other words, the browser sports no knockout new features. But the moves Mozilla has made are smart, and they’re more than enough for Firefox to keep pace with its fast-evolving rivals.

After thr jump, a look at what’s new in rough order of importance.

Speed

In many ways, today’s browser race really is a race: The single biggest trend in recent browser updates is an emphasis on speed. More specifically, an emphasis on optimizing JavaScript, the programming language that’s used on virtually all Web sites and which gives sophisticated Web apps such as Gmail much of their power. For Firefox 3.5, Mozilla created a new JavaScript engine, which it calls TraceMonkey. I used the industry-standard SunSpider benchmark, and found that TraceMonkey is zippy–2.6 times faster than the old Firefox JavaScript engine, essentially tied with Safari for second place, and just a smidge behind Google’s Chrome 2.0.

Here are SunSpider results for Firefox 3.5, Firefox 3.0, Internet Explorer 8, and the newest Chrome and Opera betas–they’re the average of three passes performed on a Lenovo ThinkPad SL300 with a 1.8-GHz Core 2 Duo and 2GB of RAM, and are in milliseconds. Shorter bars are better:

I don’t want to exaggerate the importance of fast JavaScript–it’s only one factor that determines whether a browser feels snappy or not, and you’d be nuts to make it your primary criterion when choosing a browser. (I still wish Firefox 3.5 launched faster, and the Release Candidate version, at least, can still bog down if you open too many tabs.) But JavaScript performance is a big deal, and TraceMonkey gives Firefox a noticeable speed boost.

Privacy

Firefox 3.5 introduces a private browsing option–often called a “porn mode” and usually touted by browser companies as having many other uses, such as letting you hide the holiday shopping you’re doing for your family or borrow a friend’s browser without messing up his or her history. (Then again, Microsoft seems to have given up and is running an IE ad pitching InPrivate as a way to avoid seeing your spouse’s nauseating fetish porn.)

Mozilla calls its private browsing feature…Private Browsing. It’s largely similar to its counterparts in Chrome, IE, and Safari, except that Firefox closes all your open tabs when you begin to browse privately, then restores them when you’re done. It’s a logical way to demarcate things, and probably helps remind you to leave private mode when you’re finished, although reloading your tabs can take a while if you’re as much of a tab freak as I am.

Firefox Private Browsing

None of these browsers’ privacy features are exactly foolproof–the video-downloading feature in RealPlayer, for instance, helpfully keeps on logging all of the videos on pages you visit even when you’re in a privacy mode. Keep that in mind if you’re paranoid about keeping your online wanderings under wraps.

A new “Forget About This Site” option is a sort of retroactive form of Private Browsing that lets you remove evidence you’d visited a site after the fact. But it’s pretty buried: I could only find it by pulling up the History browser, then right-clicking on a page.

Firefox 3.5 Forget

Rather than making erasing your browser’s cookies, cache, and other items an all-or-nothing affair, version 3.5 lets you delete changed for just the past hour, two hours, four hours, or day. Only Chrome does something similar, but its time frames are less useful, since the smallest one is “last day.”

Firefox Clear Recent History

Minor New Features and Tweaks

Firefox 3.5 adds a bunch of small new features and refinements to existing tools, most of which feel like they’re aimed at advanced types. You can now drag a tab out of the window to turn it into a new window of its own, and reverse the process by dragging a window back into tab form. The excellent Awesome Bar address bar, which lets you do search, pull up bookmarks, and retrieve pages from your history, has rid itself of a slight lag it sometimes suffered. It’s also added a really geeky power-user feature: filters that let your refine results as you type by entering “world #”, for instance, to show only pages from your history.

Two new options on the History menu let you re-open tabs and windows you’ve recently closed. I’ve been known to zap a tab by mistake, so if I can remember these items are there, I’ll use them.

Firefox Recently Closed Windows

1 2 NEXT PAGE»


66 Comments


Read more: , , , , , ,

25 Comments For This Post

  1. Evan Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 5:11 am

    Nice review. Do current extensions work, or do they need to be updated.

  2. Rimantas Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 5:36 am

    Safari 10 beta? What’s that?

  3. Anon Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 6:12 am

    hahaha Safari 10?

    Safari 4 on my machine got around 550 in Sunspider, FF3.5 got around 1100.

    In V8v4, Safari 4 got around 3000, FF3.5 got around 300.

  4. Rafael E. Belliard Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 6:15 am

    “Two new options on the History menu let you re-open tabs and windows you’ve recently closed.”

    FYI, the ability to open recently closed tabs has been on firefox at least since Firefox 3.0. Great review, though. 🙂

    http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/2523/firefox3recentlytabs.jpg

  5. Don Clark - Atlanta, GA Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 6:25 am

    The only reason that I (and many of my coworkers) havent switched to chrome is that we have grown so attached to the Add-ons for Firefox. I did have a love affair with Opera for a couple of years, but I have been happily engaged to Firefox for over 5 years now.

  6. Rafael E. Belliard Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 6:28 am

    Agreed with Clark. Firefox add-ons are its real killer-app. Adblock, Mail managers, Foxmarks, Firebug, Flashgot, et al. That’s why Opera never stood a chance with me.

  7. Spellcheck Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    sorry to nitpick, but the proper spelling is “shoo-in,” not “shoe-in”
    (see: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shoo-in and http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/shoo-in)

  8. AMSR Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Safari 10 beta? You mean Safari 4 Release? /confused

  9. John Baxter Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    On the Mac where I’ve been gently kicking the 3.5RC series’ tires, the browser seemed to convert itself automatically to 3.5 when I started it this morning.

    Being the nasty suspicious type that I am, I downloaded a fresh copy. which turned out to be a few thousand bytes smaller. I’ve replaced what was there with the downloaded form (which stayed the same size when launched and quit.

    I suspect that is a distinction without a difference, though.

  10. Tonio Loewald Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    I just tried Sunspider on my XP SP3 32-bit machine with the latest Safari 4 and Firefox 3.5 and got *dramatically* different results: overall — Safari 4 1.5x faster. Are you perhaps running a 64-bit version of Mozilla against a 32-bit version of Safari?

  11. Harry McCracken Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 9:55 am

    @tonio: Nope, 32-bit versions of Firefox 3.5 and Safari on a 32-bit OS (Windows XP). I’ll keep an eye out for what others report…

    Thanks,

    –Harry

  12. fred buddemeyer Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    wordtolb this review is rated 8.9 overall subject=harry mccraken evaluator=fred buddemeyer

  13. riflessioniquotidiane Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    good browser firefox.
    http://riflessioniquotidiane.wordpress.com

  14. sohbet Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    hi blog
    “The first step we’re taking sets new efficiency standards on fluorescent and incandescent lighting. Now I know light bulbs may not seem sexy, but this simple action holds enormous promise because 7 percent of all the energy consumed in America is used to light our homes and our businesses. Between 2012 and 2042, these new standards will save consumers up to $4 billion a year, conserve enough electricity to power every home in America for 10 months, reduce…

  15. jagraham Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Just installed the new 3.5 update and I haven’t noticed a huge difference in speed, a little faster perhaps, but on average it doesn’t seem to be 2.5 times faster. I do like some of the little tweaks though; the ‘awesome bar’ seems a little smoother and the ‘private browsing’ matches that of IE8. The time Firefox takes to start up is a bit of a pain still though and it still uses quite a bit more RAM than IE, but that’s something I can put up with.

  16. Gadden Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 5:25 am

    Hey nice article 😀
    take a look at my blog http://www.hardwarehome.wordpress.com

  17. lida diyet zayıflama r10seoogle Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am

    Anyway, here’s a more in-depth review.Thanks

  18. Slym Says:
    July 20th, 2009 at 1:27 am

    This is really a great review and beneficial too.
    I will work on it and explore it further. firefox nowdays is an essential utility to surf internet in easy and fast way. I am lovin it

  19. Prakash Says:
    August 27th, 2009 at 7:11 am

    Hello people,
    I have been using the FF 3.5 since two weeks. While it is a faster browser than the previous one, it is at the same time not so stable. Like i am using the google mail and it does not load the editor window while composing a mail. In this way the previous version was better.
    Hope the programmers fix this problem with the next version.
    Except that i thank the mozilla team for their great service.

    Prakash

  20. Coach Says:
    November 29th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    I’ve been a user of Firefox since v1 and now am on a crusade to convert all my site visitors to Firefox from IE.

    Many visitors complain that my sites slow down or that the browser ‘freezes’ when visiting my site, in addition to multiple security warnings. I now realise that most of these visitors experience this because they are using the default IE browser. Once they switch to Firefox or Chrome, these problems disappear!

  21. William Roberts Says:
    May 11th, 2010 at 8:18 pm

    Incandescent light bulbs will soon be phased out because they waste a lot of energy.,*~

  22. yhwebcn Says:
    August 10th, 2010 at 1:09 am

    Watch is an accessory, only one person should not be:
    50 Fathoms Watches

    Breguet Classique Tourbillon Watches
    the pursuit of quality of life of people now have become a mainstream,
    Bell & Ross Watches Accessories
    BR 01 – Instrument 46mm Watches
    from the exterior to the movement of people everywhere to work are moving fine.so more and more customers will buy a few watches to match different to clothing differently occasions,
    BR 02 – Instrument 44mm Watches
    such as have to watch while swimming at a business dinner to watch and definitely not one to wear light-colored shirt and suit T shirt to watch the same can not, therefore, essentially, the watch is a work of art,
    BR 03 – Instrument 42mm Watches
    Breitling Accessories Watches

  23. yhwebcn Says:
    August 10th, 2010 at 1:09 am

    please come here, we are lowest price replica Watches supplier,
    Royal Oak Offshore Watches
    Replica Riviera Watches
    offer high-class fake Watches in about 100 famous brands。Watch the quality is good and my hands the final say, the buyer's evaluation of the quality of the watch is the most objective evaluation.Replica Breguet Type XX Watches
    Allows you to truly experience the fun of online shopping, and that one of the baby's expectations.Audemars Piguet Jules Audemars Watches
    Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Watches
    Welcome customers to patronize, to buy more discount more than the price the same product we; the same price we are more than quality;the same quality service site that we were honest promise:Quality assurance; customer first; credit management,Avenger Skyland

  24. yhwebcn Says:
    August 10th, 2010 at 1:10 am

    So that every customer can buy the rest assured that with the peace of mind! Your satisfaction is my greatest joy! Either give it away or bring their own are a good choice!Replica Swiss Chronomat Watch
    Breitling Evolution Watches
    In order to meet their own pursuit of the watch, although the top watch can not afford this life,Replica Swiss Montbrillant Watch
    Replica Swiss Navitimer Watch
    Replica Swiss Superocean Watch
    and a few pieces, but can buy high quality imitation table … reason to believe that a different way of life for those who desire for the urban population power with lore.

  25. water damge orange county Says:
    January 8th, 2011 at 2:40 pm

    I cannot wait to study more of this beneficial topic. So much than me Ive never even regarded. You sure did put an exciting new twist on something that Ive heard a lot of about. I dont believe Ive actually read any scenario that does this subject of the same quality justice as you simply just did.

41 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. The Firefox Cometh! | Snoopy on Skittles Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 7:06 am

    […] (Image via Technologizer) […]

  2. Web Media Daily – Tues. June 30, 2009 | Reinventing Yourself... Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 7:09 am

    […] Firefox 3.5: The Technologizer Review …Technologizer […]

  3. The Firefox Cometh! | Jay Daily Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 7:41 am

    […] (Image via Technologizer) […]

  4. Firefox 3.5 Tips and Tricks Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 9:08 am

    […] The Tecnologizer reviews the new features in Firefox 3.5, telling us about the new features that have been included in Firefox 3.5 and more, head over and read Firefox 3.5 Review. […]

  5. Firefox is Getting a Bit Plump Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 9:12 am

    […] Anyway, here’s a more in-depth review. […]

  6. Porque recomiendo usar Firefox | Jose Orestes Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    […] web usando la ingeniera TraceMonkey en JavaScript, optimizando aplicaciones como Gmail. Según Technologizer la velocidad todavía no es optima en la Beta pero se a dado un gran paso. Posibilidad de compartir […]

  7. Firefox 3.5 released; What’s new and exciting? | Geekword Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    […] let’s talk about the Speed of this very new browser, here is the SunSpider result for Firefox 3.5, Firefox 3.0, Internet […]

  8. More Proof that P0rn Drives Web Tech | _mindMeld Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 11:08 am

    […] link: Firefox 3.5: The Technologizer Review | Technologizer […]

  9. Firefox 3.5 Released « The Firefox Extension Guru’s Blog Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 11:43 am

    […] Firefox 3.5: The Technologizer Review […]

  10. Firefox reaches 3.5 - but are browser wars out of touch? @ Technology News Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    […] people are enthusiastic: Harry McCracken at Technologizer says that FF remains the best choice for the widest array of folks. Slate’s Farhad Manjoo, meanwhile says it’s not withering from […]

  11. Firefox 3.5 takes you back to a time before browser add-ons | UpOff.com Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    […] his review of the new browser, Technologizer’s Henry McCracken says, “Not all Add-Ons will be compatible with Firefox […]

  12. Top 5 Killer Features in Firefox 3.5 Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    […] from Technologizer and PCPro show that with TraceMonkey, Firefox 3.5 remains a viable option for web application […]

  13. Top 5 Killer Features in Firefox 3.5 | HyipLife.com Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    […] from Technologizer and PCPro show that with TraceMonkey, Firefox 3.5 remains a viable option for web application […]

  14. Top 5 Killer Features in Firefox 3.5 | TechDozer.Com Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    […] from Technologizer and PCPro show that with TraceMonkey, Firefox 3.5 remains a viable option for web application […]

  15. Top 5 Killer Features in Firefox 3.5 | www.3gcom.org Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    […] from Technologizer and PCPro show that with TraceMonkey, Firefox 3.5 remains a viable option for web application […]

  16. Firefox 3.5 released :: Andrej Koelewijn Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    […] 3.5 has been released. Not everybody is excited about this release, but most reviews are quite positive. In my opinion, the enhanced javascript performance is the most important […]

  17. Download of the day: Firefox 3.5 | csmonitor.com Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    […] reviews have been glowing. Technologizer calls it the most well-rounded […]

  18. SeoMaster » Blog Archive » Nuevo Firefox 3.5 + + + Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    […] es la palabra clave de esta actualización. En Technologyzer ya han hecho una prueba y no tiene nada que envidiar a sus competidores: abre el JavaScript -probablemente el lenguaje más […]

  19. Firefox 3.5 todo velocidad -- Tecnobichos Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

    […] es la palabra clave de esta actualización. En Technologyzer ya han hecho una prueba y no tiene nada que envidiar a sus competidores: abre el JavaScript […]

  20. Top Posts « WordPress.com Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    […] Firefox 3.5: The Technologizer Review Was it really fewer than five years ago that Firefox 1.0 debuted? Its arrival ended the dismal period in which only one […] […]

  21. Mozilla Firefox 3.5 Has Finally Arrived! « Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    […] product page or via software update. For good review of Mozilla Firefox 3.5 you can go here: https://www.technologizer.com/2009/06/30/firefox-3-5-review/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Firefox 3 has Arrived.Browser: Firefox 3.5 Final […]

  22. Top 5 Killer Features in Firefox 3.5 | NASZAKLASA Says:
    June 30th, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    […] from Technologizer and PCPro show that with TraceMonkey, Firefox 3.5 remains a viable option for web application […]

  23. Firefox 3.5 ya ha llegado « Videogamer Blog Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 1:25 am

    […] es una forma de mirar las cosas, pero para hacernos una mejor idea, gracias a Technologizer, podemos ver un análisis entre toda la competencia, donde Firefox queda en segundo lugar por muy […]

  24. Firefox 3.5 dirilis, Lebih Cepat Lebih Baik « Tempat Untuk Berbagi Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 1:57 am

    […] Sumber : https://www.technologizer.com/2009/06/30/firefox-3-5-review/ […]

  25. Firefox 3.5 – Die 5 besten Neuerungen Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 4:04 am

    […] Die Geschwindkeitsverbesserung basieren primär auf einer neuen Javascript-Engine – und die kann sich auch im Wettbewerbsumfeld sehr gut sehen lassen: Tracemonkey Test mit den wichtigsten Browsern (Firefox, Safari, Chrome, Opera, IE8) (Quelle: Technologizer.com) […]

  26. Firefox 3.5 Review Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 5:15 am

    […] result of a new JavaScript Engine called TraceMonkey for this version of firefox. The test run by Technologiser indicates it is 2.6 times faster than old firefox JavaScript engine in the industry standard […]

  27. Firefox: The Next Generation :: Innovation in Software :: The Vagueware Blog Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 9:03 am

    […] the really clever stuff seems to happen first, and it’s gaining pace. Everybody is obviously raving about Firefox 3.5 that was released yesterday, but yesterday’s release is of no interest to […]

  28. links for 2009-07-01 « Tuna Park Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 11:03 am

    […] Firefox 3.5: The Technologizer Review | Technologizer "Bottom line: If you seek browser advice from me and we’re not in a hurry, I may assess your particular needs and suggest something other than Mozilla’s browser. But if time is of the essence, I’ll happily give the six-word recommendation I’ve provided countless times since 2004: You won’t go wrong with Firefox." (tags: fx35 firefox) […]

  29. Techknology’s Blog » Murphy’s Law: Is a Firefox 3.5 Really That Fast? Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    […] and their validity for real-world comparisons. Using this very benchmark, Harry McCracken of Technologizer notes that Firefox 3.5 delivers a performance improvement that’s 2.4 times faster than […]

  30. Is a Firefox 3.5 Really That Fast? | Xtreme Core Says:
    July 1st, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    […] and their validity for real-world comparisons. Using this very benchmark, Harry McCracken of Technologizernotes that Firefox 3.5 delivers a performance improvement that’s 2.4 times faster than Firefox […]

  31. Firefox 3.5 released : Review in Nutshell | TechDusts Says:
    July 2nd, 2009 at 12:28 pm

    […] Tecnologizer […]

  32. Top 5 Killer Features in Firefox 3.5 « Internet Marketing KB Says:
    July 3rd, 2009 at 3:10 am

    […] from Technologizer and PCPro show that with TraceMonkey, Firefox 3.5 remains a viable option for web application […]

  33. Southside Computer Care » Blog Archive » New Firefox 3.5 makes for faster more convenient browsing Says:
    July 9th, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    […] How much faster is open to debate. Mozilla says it ran the industry-standard SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark, which measures how quickly browsers render JavaScript, on versions 2, 3 and 3.5 of Firefox, and asserts that the newest version is more than twice as fast as Firefox 3 and more than ten times as fast as Firefox 2 on the test. Other testers have reported similar results. […]

  34. Takethe5th Picks and Pans » Blog Archive » RWW’s Sarah Perez: Microsoft Hitwoman? Says:
    July 21st, 2009 at 10:58 am

    […] the last 2 months] or final release of Firefox 3.5 which shows marked performance improvements such that it is neck and neck with Chrome 2.0 and Safari 4.0. Again, Ms. Perez would do readers a service by asking her Microsoft 10 colleagues to predict when […]

  35. List of Firefox 3.5 Tips and Tricks | The Hidden Guide Says:
    August 13th, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    […] The Tecnologizer reviews the new features in Firefox 3.5, telling us about the new features that have been included in Firefox 3.5 and more, head over and read Firefox 3.5 Review. […]

  36. Firefox 3.5 makes browsing faster, easier and more fun | Ezine AIO Says:
    August 21st, 2009 at 2:28 am

    […] How much faster is open to debate. Mozilla says it ran the industry-standardSunSpider JavaScript Benchmark, which measures how quickly browsers render JavaScript, on versions 2, 3 and 3.5 of Firefox, and asserts that the newest version is more than twice as fast as Firefox 3 and more than ten times as fast as Firefox 2 on the test. Other testers have reported similar results. […]

  37. Stupid ads solving non-existent problems and other bad sales pitches : Says:
    November 3rd, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    […] Not bad for a free browser developed by an not-for-profit foundation.  Oh, and it’s the best product on the market.  That’s got to […]

  38. Five Reasons to Celebrate Firefox’s Fifth Birthday | Technologizer Says:
    November 9th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    […] It’s spurned bloat. In many ways, today’s Firefox 3.5 doesn’t feel radically different from 2004’s Firefox 1.0. That’s a good […]

  39. Opera 10.5: Better and Chrome-ier Says:
    February 11th, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    […] engine, which the company says is eight times faster than the old one. (The previous engine performed poorly compared to other browsers in the SunSpider benchmark test.) Judging browser speed based largely on JavaScript doesn’t make a lot of sense, but all of […]

  40. Link Fire: 1st July 09 Says:
    October 6th, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    […] Firefox 3.5 review – A close up look at the features and performance of Firefox latest browser version 3.5 by Technologizer. [link] […]

  41. Firefox 3.5 released; What’s new and exciting? | Geekword Says:
    June 1st, 2014 at 6:28 am

    […] let’s talk about the Speed of this very new browser, here is the SunSpider result for Firefox 3.5, Firefox 3.0, Internet […]