By Harry McCracken | Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 1:40 pm
I’m through with declaring any tech product or service to be a “killer” of any other tech product or service. But I will say this: If Twitter is found dead anytime in the next couple of years, someone’s going to need to hide Google Buzz, which debuted this morning, from the police.
Buzz seems to have most all the features that Twitter is missing, and Google is clearly going to take advantage of all the benefits of being Google to make it popular–most notably the inboxes of unspecified millions of Gmail users who’ll get Buzz as a service-within-the-service. My impression is that Google really, really wants this to be the dominant service in the still-evolving category of “that thing that Twitter does that doesn’t have a good name yet.”
I’m still figuring out Buzz’s implications, and so far I’ve been able to try it out only briefly, and only on my iPhone. (Google is rolling out Buzz to Gmail users over the next few days, and I’m not one of the very first people to get in.) In a moment, a few of the questions that are popping into my head about the service–but first, here’s Google’s blog post about Buzz, and a little movie it made about Buzz:
1. Will more features matter this time? As lots of folks are pointing out, Buzz bears a striking resemblance to FriendFeed, a service that was widely hailed as a potential Twitter killer until Facebook bought it and more or less put it into suspended animation last August. Like FriendFeed, Buzz has none of Twitter’s innumerable limitations and irritations. But being more powerful than Twitter hasn’t helped any site compete with Twitter to date. (Exception: Facebook, which feels more and more like PowerTwitter these days–but which had the advantage of being far larger than Twitter in the first place.)
I don’t think being more powerful than Twitter is enough in itself to give Buzz an edge. (Then again, I think of Twitter’s 140-character limit as a pro, not a con.) But more features+e-mail integration gives Buzz a distinct identity. And Google will be able to plug away with the service forever if it feels like it, unlike FriendFeed or almost any other previous Twitter competitor.
2. How big is the potential market for Buzz? In theory, at least as big as the total number of Gmail users, I guess. But we know that there are plenty of perfectly sensible people who are aware of Twitter but can’t understand why anyone would use it. Will they be more open-minded about Buzz? It’s also obvious that plugging a new Google service into Gmail isn’t a guaranteed road to sucess–if it were, Google Talk have a far higher profile than it did.
3. Will “PageRank for Buzz” work? The single worst thing about Twitter isn’t the Failwhale, or spam, or people announcing that they’ve just eaten a poached egg. It’s that Twitter does so very little to help me find interesting people, updates, and links. Actually, it’s never done much of anything in that regard other than suggest that I follow a bunch of famous people.
4. What will the ads be like? Twitter’s ongoing disinterest in putting traditional ads next to tweets means that we don’t completely understand the implications of sophisticated ad targeting of status messages. If you mention bocce will Buzz give you ads for bocce balls? Will that annoy and/or creep anyone out any more than people are annoyed and/or creeped out by Gmail’s ads?
Google, which is really good at using computers to identify relevance and quality, is at least going to try to apply such techniques to Buzz. If it works, Twitter runs the risk of becoming AltaVista–a service that was widely beloved until Google came along and proved that AltaVista’s results were a largely undifferentiated pile of links.
5. What does Buzz mean for Facebook? I’m still not clear on whether Buzz is going to feel like a loosely-knit, somewhat impersonal network of friends, acquaintances, celebs, and people I’ve forgotten I’m following (like Twitter) or a true replication of my social world online (like Facebook). I’m not even sure if Google knows–maybe it’ll sit back and let Buzz users decide.
If Buzz does end up feeling like a truly personal social network it’ll be Google’s second major pass at social networking after the popular-in-Brazil Orkut. And it’ll be the competition with Facebook that”ll be more interesting than the one with Twitter.
6. What does Buzz mean for Google Wave? On the surface, it’s aimed at consumers and Wave is meant for business users. No major conflict, right? Um, not: Google stressed today that it thinks Buzz is great for the workplace, too, and therefore intends to launch a corporate version at some point. There are any number of ways in which Buzz and Wave are different, but the situation reminds me a little of Google’s simultaneous development of Android and Chrome OS. Clearly, Google isn’t a company that’s afraid of competing with itself or coming at a big challenge from two different directions.
7. What does Buzz mean for Foursquare? It features a checking-in feature that’s decidedly similar to the trendy local-doings service. I’m not going to check in to both Buzz and Foursquare, but if there were a way to push Buzz to Foursquare or vice versa, I’d consider it.
(Side note: I’ve tried Buzz’s check-in feature, which tries to determine the business or other location you’re at automatically, twice so far. The first time it didn’t figure out I was at Google; the second time it guessed that I was at the Computer History Museum rather than the nearby Starbucks where I am right now.)
8. How fully-baked is Buzz? I can’t judge that until I’ve used it in Gmail. So far, though, it’s slick in some ways: The iPhone/Android version is, like Gmail, one of the most applike browser-based services I’ve ever seen. But it’s oddly slapdash in others: buzz.google.com invites me to go to Gmail to try Buzz even though it’s not enabled there yet, and when I try to post a Buzz on my iPhone it fails every time. And for all the things Buzz does, it’s launching without numerous obvious features, such as the ability to send Buzz updates to Twitter.
9. How patient will Google be with it? There are two kinds of Google products: The ones that get so much TLC that they improve at a dizzying rate (Gmail, Google Chrome) and the ones that either die or fester (Google Groups, Google Lively, Froogle/Google Product Search, Google Groups). Buzz will be an example of the first type of Google product. Won’t it?
10. What does Yahoo think about the name? It’s already got a service with the same moniker. Then again, Yahoo’s Buzz is a shameless knockoff of Digg, so Yahoo might want to be careful about accusing anyone of copying anyone else.
More thoughts once I’m fully into the service. I’d love to hear yours, especially if you’re already buzzing and being buzzed…
[…] Google Buzz, however, is different. Google could have launched it as a closed beta a la Google Wave or Google Voice, Instead, it skipped tryouts and went straight to Broadway, by opening the service up to every Gmail user over the next few few days. To a degree that’s really unusual in the history of the Web, Buzz will be chockablock with millions of confused newcomers all at once. Expect “trying out Buzz” and similar sentiments to be the primary form of Buzzing at first. […]
[…] Google Buzz, however, is different. Google could have launched it as a closed beta a la Google Wave or Google Voice, Instead, the company decided to skip tryouts and go straight to Broadway, by opening the service up to every Gmail user over the next few few days. To a degree that’s really unusual in the history of the Web, Buzz will be chockablock with millions of confused newcomers all at once. Expect “trying out Buzz” and similar sentiments to be the primary form of Buzzing at first. […]
[…] I’m through with declaring any tech product or service to be a “ killer ” of any other tech product or service. But I will say this: If Twitter is found dead anytime in the next couple of years, someone’s going to need to hide Google Buzz computer history […]
[…] yesterday’s Google Buzz launch, Yahoo’s event doesn’t involve any major announcement. We’ve seen a few brief […]
[…] Ten Questions About Google Buzz (technologizer.com) […]
[…] Ten Questions About Google Buzz (technologizer.com) […]
[…] Ten Questions About Google Buzz (tags: Media&Journalism socialmedia googlebuzz facebook) […]
[…] Ten Questions About Google Buzz […]
[…] all: News It’s now been 72 hours since Google launched its Google Buzz social-sharing service and started rolling it out to Gmail users. Much of the coverage so far has been […]
[…] Ten Questions About Google Buzz (technologizer.com)(Cross-posted @ TechWag )Posted Under : Marketing Analysis Tags google Twitter web 2.0 education technology Facebook Louis Gray FriendFeed idea Participation Social media Social network service Share this article: Permalink TrackBack No one has commented yet! Be the first one to comment! Your comment is awaiting moderation! Post Comment […]
[…] launches Buzz, a Twitter-like service whose defining feature is that it’s built into Gmail, thereby turning […]
[…] launches Buzz, a Twitter-like service whose defining feature is that it’s built into Gmail, thereby turning […]
[…] thing, I have a lousy track record when it comes to gut reactions about Google social services. I thought Buzz was intriguing, and I didn’t instantly figure out the privacy issues. And I had visions of Google Wave leading to an epic war between Google and […]
[…] thing, I have a lousy track record when it comes to gut reactions about Google social services. I thought Buzz was intriguing, and I didn’t instantly figure out the privacy issues. And I had visions of Google Wave leading to an epic war between Google and […]
[…] thing, I have a lousy track record when it comes to gut reactions about Google social services. I thought Buzz was intriguing, and I didn’t instantly figure out the privacy issues. And I had visions of Google Wave leading to an epic war between Google and […]
February 9th, 2010 at 6:05 am
Actually there is one question that seems to be the most important one (at least to me) that nobody is asking: How will Google Buzz work for non-GMail users?
When you are going social you don't want any boundaries. I won't spend my time posting on Buzz and reaching only my GMail friends while I can use Twitter and reach everybody.
Does it make sense to force companies and news agencies to create a GMail account to go social on Buzz?
And even if they don't require a GMail account (as they don't for Orkut), how will all features (inbox notifications, etc.) work for non-GMail users?
I like the fact they want it to communicate with other products (Twitter, etc.) but they really should think about non-GMail users first, otherwise nobody will use it.
January 4th, 2012 at 5:53 am
Don't see how this is a problem, just start using Gmail :). Muay Thai Combinations | Muay Thai Kick | Martial Arts for Children
February 9th, 2010 at 2:20 pm
I’m buzzing already, and while it has a feel of Wave, that’s strictly UI only at this point. I seem to be the only one of my peers buzzing, and so am waiting on more buzzers to join in.
@140 char limit is a boon, was there ever a question that this was part of the keen appeal of twitter?
I’m curious what the prospects are for Twitter of having the google-web hitting their servers for millions of gmail users following in both directions… There may be $$$ reasons why buzz hasn’t joined in to Twitter just yet…
February 9th, 2010 at 5:59 pm
As someone who is probably “people [you’ve] forgotten [you’re] following”, I rather like the fact Twitter has a combination of people I know personally, know professionally, and don’t know but share common interests with. And I like that Facebook is, for the most part, people I know personally and select people I know professionally.
I’m not sure where Google Buzz will fit in, so I think I’ll sit back and see where others place it. Right now it is just one more technology competing for my attention and bandwith.
February 9th, 2010 at 10:18 pm
@Marcelo I totally agree. Google has this problem where they don’t realize that not everyone is on Gmail or that not everyone uses their email a lot. They needed to make Buzz independednt of Gmail and available to anyone who had a email account, Gmail, live, or yahoo. Google needs to work on their social approach because they approached it all wrong.
February 10th, 2010 at 7:15 am
The little movie is enticing (Google is good at that). The reality? Will I be able to shut it off when it shows up in my GMail accounts?
February 10th, 2010 at 4:47 pm
John, there is a way to do that, thanks to Gina Trapani’s post:
http://www.fastcompany.com/1546226/how-to-do-everything-in-google-buzz-including-turn-it-off
Because I also didn’t want Buzz in my inbox.
Cheers, Bill
February 10th, 2010 at 7:49 pm
What about Google Wave
Why is Google trying so hard to integrate everything in gmail when also want to make google wave the next big communication platform.
July 2nd, 2011 at 6:56 am
Saved as a favorite, I really like your blog
February 23rd, 2012 at 5:12 pm
Oh, I did not know about the benefits of Google Buzz. Actually, I just ignore this stuff. But after reading your post, I might try it now.