Silverlight: The Cup is Three-Quarters Full

By  |  Tuesday, November 2, 2010 at 11:56 am

Last week, I wrote about an interesting post by ZDnet’s Mary Jo Foley in which Bob Muglia, president of Microsoft’s servers and tools business, seemed to be downplaying Silverlight, Microsoft’s Flash-like plugin for rich Internet applications. Muglia has followed up with a blog post of his own at Microsoft’s site in which he sounds more upbeat about Silverlight--although he’s equally high on HTML5. I don’t think there’s any basic conflict between what Muglia said in his interview with Mary Jo and what he says in his post. It’s a matter of spin, and he wanted to reassure Silverlight developers that the platform has a future.

There’s no question that Silverlight (and Flash) can do many things that HTML can’t today, and which HTML5 won’t be able to do anytime soon. As a user of Web sites, though, I’m way more excited about cool stuff that works in any modern browser than I am about cool stuff that requires a plugin from a particular company. The quality of the support for HTML5 and other new technologies in the Internet Explorer 9 beta is encouraging evidence that Microsoft’s Silverlight strategy doesn’t involve cramming the plugin down anyone’s throat.

1 Comment

Read more: , ,

1 Comments For This Post

  1. John Baxter Says:

    I don't mind installing Silverlight when there's a reason (as, with Windows Live Essentials of course, there is–it's called requirement).

    On the other hand, I remove Adobe Air whenever I can, and select against applications that use Air. In part because having Adobe Air and forgetting it is a great way to have an obsolete Flash and its vulnerabilities on board.