By Harry McCracken | Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 10:11 am
Here’s the second half of Jay Greene’s story on Microsoft’s two-screen Courier tablet, and why it never saw the light of day except as a spellbinding concept video.
Basically put, he's saying Microsoft decided to stick to an already-failed paradigm to force a full OS onto a handheld device despite all the issues, gaffes and downright low sales they've had now for over 10 years. They believed the yelps and hollas of the anti-Apple zealots that a full OS was the only way a tablet could succeed in the face of Apple's roaring success using a truly touch-centric OS. The fault, my friends, is ALL Microsoft's.
I, for one, think the Courier is still the better choice, though Microsoft's initial concept was too limited in scope.
November 2nd, 2011 at 10:41 am
Basically put, he's saying Microsoft decided to stick to an already-failed paradigm to force a full OS onto a handheld device despite all the issues, gaffes and downright low sales they've had now for over 10 years. They believed the yelps and hollas of the anti-Apple zealots that a full OS was the only way a tablet could succeed in the face of Apple's roaring success using a truly touch-centric OS. The fault, my friends, is ALL Microsoft's.
I, for one, think the Courier is still the better choice, though Microsoft's initial concept was too limited in scope.