Tag Archives | AT&T

AT&T Looks to Repair Image Through Social Networking

AT&T is following Comcast’s lead in turning to social networking in order to repair its tarnished brand and reach out to its customers. The company is making a full court press to counter some of the negative publicity that it has received across Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube by building a support staff devoted to answering customer concerns on popular social networking sites.

That group now numbers 19, and almost half of those reached through social networking respond to the team. AT&T is also planning to actively promote the company’s participation in social networking on its bills and websites in an effort to get even more customers to use the service.

Airing customer concerns in public may seem like counter-productive to repairing the bruised image of a company, but it’s not. In the standard phone-based customer service, nobody really sees the work the company does to fix the issue except the caller and the representative. Here in the open, everyone sees it.

While the only fixes for AT&T’s problems really lie in infrastructure improvements, any effort to quell the angst of its customers will go a long way to improving its image. The media has certainly pummeled the company (and rightly so) for its missteps in recent years, especially with the iPhone. Appearing as if it cares may buy it a little more time with consumers to get things right.

[Hat tip: AdAge]

4 comments

AT&T Announces the Samsung Captivate

AT&T kept saying it was going to release a bunch of Android handsets in 2010, and it’s finally starting to feel that way. On Monday it announced the HTC Aria. And today, it’s revealed plans to start selling Samsung’s Captivate, with an oversized 4-inch AMOLED screen, a 1-GHz Samsung CPU, a 5-megapixel camera that can shoot 720p video, and something called the “Samsung Social Hub.” It’s the first AT&T Android phone that sounds like it might be a flagship of sorts, and it’ll go on sale same sometime in “the coming months.”

No comments

AT&T Presses Pause on iPhone Presales

Despite yesterday’s iPhone preordering meltdown, a heck of a lot of people reserved phoness. AT&T statement:

iPhone 4 pre-order sales yesterday were 10-times higher than the first day of pre-ordering for the iPhone 3G S last year. Consumers are clearly excited about iPhone 4, AT&T’s more affordable data plans and our early upgrade pricing.

Given this unprecedented demand and our current expectations for our iPhone 4 inventory levels when the device is available June 24, we’re suspending pre-ordering today in order to fulfill the orders we’ve already received.

The availability of additional inventory will determine if we can resume taking pre-orders.

In addition to unprecedented pre-order sales, yesterday there were more than 13 million visits to AT&T’s website where customers can check to see if they are eligible to upgrade to a new phone; that number is about 3-times higher than the previous record for eligibility upgrade checks in one day.

We are working hard to bring iPhone 4 to as many of our customers as soon as possible.

Ten times as many preorders as for the 3GS? Amazing. I’m still not a believer in “AT&T is locking people in to deny them the option of a Verizon iPhone that will be announced any day now” conspiracy theories, but that’s a lot of folks who are planning to be on AT&T through 2012…

3 comments

Report: AT&T Didn't Test iPhone Preorder System Thoroughly

As the iPhone 4 preorder disaster worsens by the minute, the blame looks to fall squarely on AT&T’s shoulders as we learn more about what went wrong. The most damaging of these may be an source close to the carrier which now claims the system which AT&T was not tested before the launch.

The source works at a third party facility that processes the orders for AT&T. Apparently, the reports of users being able to login to others accounts even though they were attempting to log into their own could be related to a botched update on AT&T’s side related to fraud.

It’s not clear if those attempting to upgrade are the only ones that may have had their information opened up to others, but the source did say problems like this have happened before. As of the time I write this, neither AT&T nor Apple have made any public statements on the matter.

AT&T’s iPhone 4 eligibility page remains down, although its online account application has been put back online. I have a request for comment out to both companies.

[Hat tip: Gizmodo]

2 comments

iPhone 4 Ordering an Embarrassment for AT&T, Apple

If you are even attempting to pre-order an iPhone 4 today, our best advice is: don’t! Both Apple and AT&T are experiencing a multitude of problems just keeping the system up–and Gizmodo has even reported that AT&T’s online system is exposing upgraders’ accounts to others.

From what people are reporting, the problem  seems to be that both AT&T employees and at-home shoppers are using a similar web interface. Now, we can’t confirm that both are one and the same, but if they are it means thousands of orders every minute are dumping into the same application.

AT&T retail stores have resorted to using pen and paper to take down names, credit card numbers, and phone numbers as the entire online system has been taken down. Don’t expect to visit Apple’s site to complete your transaction either –it’s not working either.

Worst of all, it appears the mad rush for iPhone 4 has exposed a serious hole in AT&T’s servers. Gizmodo reports that it has received several reports of users logging into their own accounts (or I should say attempting to), and being greeted with the account information of somebody else.

So who’s to blame for this one? Let’s hear from our always opinionated Technologizer readers in the comments…

Update 1: Harry McCracken reports on Twitter that the Apple Store iPhone application reservation system is appearing to fail, which makes it hard to discern whether your reservation has actually been submitted. I’ve also received an unconfirmed report that neither AT&T nor Apple are accepting phone calls at this point.

Update 2: One of our regular readers Steven Fisher makes a very good point: “Thousands of queries per minute into the same application shouldn’t be a problem. Thousands of queries per SECOND shouldn’t be a problem. Perhaps the application or the database behind it performs like crap, but scalable web interfaces are not exactly an unattainable holy grail.”

14 comments

AT&T's Other June Smartphone

Four days before the iPhone 4 goes on sale on June 24th, AT&T will start stocking the HTC Aria, which sounds like its first Android smartphone that a serious smartphone fan might take seriously. For $130 (on two-year contract after rebate) it’s got decent specs, a trackball, and what AT&T describes as an especially pocket-friendly size. It also runs Android 2.1 with HTC’s Sense interface (Google’s own Nexus One remains the only Android 2.2 phone, but please don’t call that fragmentation).

2 comments

AT&T's iPhone 4 Deals for Recent iPhone 3GS Buyers

If you’re reading this–and you are–I suspect the chances that you bought an iPhone 3GS in the last few weeks are close to zilch. Assuming that you wanted to buy an iPhone at all, you were biding your time with the expectation that the new iPhone would be available in June or July.

But there are such folks as people who buy the current iPhone immediately before the new one is announced. And AT&T seems to be making a good-faith effort to help them avoid buyers’ remorse. The logistics are a little complicated, but people who bought iPhones after May 7th will be able to upgrade to the iPhone 4 when it arrives on June 24th.

Even if you buy an iPhone 3GS right this minute–I’d advise against it–you’ll qualify for AT&T’s 30-day money back guarantee and could theoretically return it and get an iPhone 4 before your trial period ends.

Now that we know that, is there anyone out there who thinks that AT&T’s upgrade policies for the new iPhone are unreasonable?

11 comments

Analyst Says T-Mobile USA is iPhone's Next U.S. Home

Kaufman Brothers analyst Shaw Wu is made waves today by saying T-Mobile could be the next carrier in the U.S. to get the iPhone, saying that the changes to the iPhone necessary would be much less since it operates on the same technology (GSM) as current exclusive carrier AT&T.

The statement goes against the prevailing wisdom that Apple would turn to Verizon to continue expanding availability of the device. AT&T operates its 3G network in the 1900MHz band, whereas T-Mobile uses the 1700/2100MHz band. Both use the 850MHz band, meaning Apple would only need to add a single band (1700MHz) to make 3G work fully. iPhone 4 and the 3GS have already added the 2100MHz band.

With 34 million subscribers, T-Mobile would provide a significant new market for Apple. Add to this that the Cupertino company already offers the iPhone on T-Mobile’s European carriers and such a partnership is not too far fetched. Wu says that the phone could arrive as early as this fall.

Representatives with T-Mobile said that while they would love to carry the device, “ultimately it is Apple’s decision,” and refused to comment further on any speculation.

Personally, while I think it’s the logical thing to do, I don’t think its the best idea from a business sense. Verizon has some 93 million customers, which would obviously mean a much larger potential market for Apple. Spending money on development of a CDMA-capable device may not be such a bad idea.

Either way, we seem to go through this every so many months lately so I’m not expecting the iPhone to go anywhere until Apple says it will. And from all the statements — and its actions too- it appears Apple is still happy to be with AT&T.

[Hat tip: Associated Press]

12 comments

AT&T's iPad E-Mail Breach

The most fascinating thing about the case of a hacker group downloading 114,000 e-mail addresses of iPad 3G owners from AT&T’s servers–other than the confirmation that a lot of high-powered people bought iPads–is the fact that it’s a major security breach involving one of the most locked-down products on the planet. And there’s nothing iPad owners could have done to prevent it, since the data was swiped from AT&T, not individual iPads.

6 comments