Tag Archives | Yahoo

Here We Go Again – MicroHoo Search Deal Close?

Harry earlier today passed along the news that former Autodesk chief Carol Bartz is the new CEO of Yahoo. So how long did you think it would take before somebody revives the MicroHoo talk? Apparently about two hours.

Our good friend and colleague Kara Swisher over at AllThingsDigital is reporting that sources withing Microsoft are telling her that a search partnership is very close to being done. In fact, the proposal is all ready to go: all that needs to be done is the presentation to the Yahoo board.

Current talk pegs the signing as soon as January 27, which would be the company’s earnings announcement. What better way to boost your stock price than brag about a new CEO, hopefully decent earnings, and the completion of a deal that your investors have been asking for over a year?

It would also make a good first showing for the new CEO. She’d start out on the right foot and show that she’s in tune with the problems plaguing the beleagured search company.

Let the next round of speculation begin…

3 comments

A New Yahoo Boss: Carol Bartz

Carol Bartz[UPDATE: Now it’s officially offical: Here’s Yahoo’s press release on Bartz’s appointment.]

Looks like it’s all but official: The Wall Street Journal is reporting that embattled Web icon Yahoo is going to name Carol Bartz as its new CEO. Bartz, the chairman and former CEO of CAD giant Autodesk, has also spent time at Sun and 3M; she has a terrific reputation in the industry but doesn’t have a background in the Web and media stuff that drives Yahoo’s business. Then again, in eighteen months Yahoo has failed with a media guy (Terry Semel) and its cofounder, who helped invent the Web as we know it (Jerry Yang) in the CEO slot. Maybe it makes sense to try someone who’s simply a solid business executive.

Assuming Bartz is indeed stepping in, another shoe will surely drop: You gotta think that Yahoo will still be forced to sell itself off in chunks or in its entirety, merge with another company, or sharply focus its ambitions. If Bartz has the gig she was presumably hired in part on the strength of whatever future for Yahoo she articulated. Stay tuned…

2 comments

Technologizer’s Most of 2008

Technologizer's Most of 2008As I write this, there are slightly fewer than 22.5 hours left to go before 2008 is history. I promise I’ll stop looking back at the year momentarily–I already summed up its twelve biggest stories–but I’m in the mood to document a few more noteworthy items that made the year what it was. I’m calling this Technologizer’s Most of 2008, and it begins after the jump…

Continue Reading →

One comment

The 12 Biggest Tech Stories of 2008

Technologizer's Top Stories of 2008

Techwise, I’m still not sure whether I’m grateful 2008 is almost over or sorry to see it shuffle off into the past. I do know that it was a strange, eventful year–and that much of the biggest news involved Apple, Google, Microsoft, and various combinations thereof. Here’s a recap of the year’s biggest stories, as judged by a blue-ribbon panel consisting of…well, me. Feel free to counter my choices in comments if you disagree with ’em–actually, I’d be grateful if you would.

11 comments

Yahoo’s New Policy on Privacy

yahoologoHere’s some good Yahoo-related news: The company is going to start anonymizing the data it retains relating to stuff its users do on Yahoo sites a lot more quickly. At the moment, it saves data that could be associated with an individual for thirteen months before nuking it, but it’ll be slashing that to 90 days for most data, making exceptions for fraud, security, and legal obligations. The 90-day policy covers not just data relating to searches, but also the pages and ads you view and click on.

Google’s data-anonymizing process begins after nine months, so Yahoo’s move is aggressive. Let’s hope it becomes a standard for the industry–or that Google, Microsoft, and other competitors feel the urge to go even further. Sixty days, anyone? Do I hear a month?

Here’s Yahoo’s official blog post on the news.

One comment

Yahoo Rolls Out “Open” Strategy

yahoologoCycles of innovation on the Web happen rapidly, and even Yahoo fans might concede that the company has failed to keep pace with change. That’s contributed to its well-publicized recent woes. Now the company is being forced to reinvent itself by doing more to appeal to developers and embedding social networking features in its heavily-trafficked Web services.

The latest phase of that transition is an extension of its Yahoo Open Strategy (YOS) to some of its most popular Web properties, including My Yahoo, Yahoo Mail, Yahoo Toolbar, and across the company’s media Web sites.

Mostly notably, today Yahoo announced an upgrade to Yahoo Mail that serves up information that might be of interest to subscribers. The Mail site now resembles an e-mail inbox with elements of Facebook; applications and notifications surround e-mails. It keeps people in touch and looped in at a glance.

Yahoo is offering six initial Web services, including ones from third parties: Family Journal, Flixster Movies, Flickr, Photos by Xoopit, WordPress, and Yahoo Greetings. The company said in its blog that it is working to safeguard the sensitivity of users’ personal e-mail, and it will refine its application security model before opening the door to developers.

When I think of how much of my day is spent on Facebook (more than I care to admit), it makes perfect sense to follow that model. I usually have two separate browser windows open: one for Facebook and one for Gmail. Combining that functionality makes perfect sense–it’s just a shame that Yahoo had to be prodded to do it.

The Yahoo home page now has an applications sidebar that is open to third party developers, and the company has published a new theme API. Notifications about contacts’ activities across Yahoo Web properties is displayed when the user is logged in. Some notifications are pulled from Yahoo TV and Yahoo Music.

Yahoo announced its YOS strategy in October, and introduced its development platform, including Yahoo Application Platform (YAP), Yahoo Social Platform (YSP), and Yahoo Query Language (YQL), at that time. From the looks of what it has accomplished to date, Yahoo should manage to stop the hemorrhaging and retain many of its millions of users. It may even attract some new ones.

2 comments

The Best of Frenemies

frenemies-splash5

Frenemy: Someone who is both friend and enemy, a relationship that is both mutually beneficial or dependent while being competitive, fraught with risk and mistrust.

Urban Dictionary

That’s not a bad first stab at a definition, but let’s expand on it: A frenemy can be a friend who evolves into an enemy. Or an enemy who morphs into a friend. Or a friend who seems to be an enemy, or an enemy who seems to be a friend. Or someone who teeters precariously between friendship and enemyhood, sometimes over the course of decades. One thing, however, is undeniable about frenemies: The technology world has always been rife with them. Consider these twelve outstanding examples–past, present, and future.

31 comments

10 Pieces of Unsolicited, Unsophisticated Advice for Yahoo

dearyahooThe very first Web site I ever visited was Yahoo. It made enough of an impression that I remember the timeframe almost exactly (early November of 1994). I also remember the search I did, for the comic strip Krazy Kat, and how impressed I was that Yahoo pulled up several dozen Web sites with information on it. (Search for “Krazy Kat” on Yahoo today and you get 1,240,000 results.) Bottom line: I still feel proprietary about Yahoo and feel a twinge of personal distress when when it goes through bad times like its CEO woes and the massive layoffs it’s conducting today.

I mention this not because it makes me special but because it’s so completely ordinary–for millions of folks, it’s hard to imagine a Web without Yahoo and Yahoo-owned services such as Flickr. I’d love to see Yahoo thrive in the years to come. I call the advice that follows “unsophisticated” because it has nothing to do with issues like the company’s stock price or ad sales strategy or overall financial health. And most of it is probably as painfully obvious as it is sincere. (Much of it, I’m sure, the company is doing right now.) It’s just the earnest, instinctive thoughts of one Yahoo fan–namely me.

So here are ten pieces of advice to Yahoo:

1) Whatever you do, please do your damndest to keep your internal machinations out of the press, once the layoffs are complete and a new CEO is on board? Wouldn’t be it be way better if a typical article or blog post about Yahoo was about a cool new service rather than an embarrassing example of corporate dysfunction? (Yahoo is under such a magnifying glass at the moment that every function looks dysfunctional.)

2) Either sell yourself or large parts of yourself to some other company–Microsoft, AOL, whoever–quickly, or redouble your efforts to stay independent. You can’t talk about “bleeding purple” and be willing to sell yourself to the highest bidder. Choose one path.

3) Right this very minute, do everything in your power to make sure that signature properties such as Yahoo Mail and My Yahoo are relevant, not relics. I like the idea of Yahoo-Mail-as-platform, for instance.

4) Speaking of My Yahoo, make it relevant to sophisticated Web users again. In general, it’s probably a good idea for Yahoo not to robotically follow Google’s lead, but is there any question that My Yahoo circa late 2008 should be a lot more like iGoogle?

5) Make sure that your ability to crank out potentially interesting new services never exceeds your ability to make sure the world knows about them. (For the past few years, you’ve seemingly specialized in launching worthwhile things that fall between the cracks, and you don’t have that luxury anymore.)

6) Make a list of your most intriguing big ideas for Yahoo’s future, then weed it down to the best ten percent. Then kill half of those. Focus on what’s left.

7) Figure out a coherent strategy for what Yahoo means on a mobile phone. Communicate that strategy coherently. (Yahoo Go and Yahoo OneConnect are two different things–I think–but I have trouble remembering which is which.)

8) Create a better, less corporate corporate blog than Yodel Anecdotal (and give it a better name while you’re at it).

9) Don’t ostracize Jerry Yang. He turned out to be the wrong guy to run Yahoo at this particular time in history, but he’s part of your heritage, and it would be cool if he could be part of your future, too.

10) If Yahoo staffers think that the the color purple is synonymous with Yahoo–and they seem to–make sure that Yahoo users do, too. I think the association of Yahoo and purple refers to the color of the company’s headquarters–the purple logo above isn’t the standard one on the Yahoo home page. Isn’t it a little weird for there to be that much of a disconnect between the perception of employees and customers?

Any other unsolicited advice for Yahoo–unsophisticated or otherwise? I’d love to see them flourish forever, and for people to forget that they ever seemed to be in dire straits at all…

3 comments

Yahoo Glue: It’s Like Last Year’s Ask.com (and That’s Good!)

yahoogluelogoLast month, I groused about the fact that Ask.com had rolled out a redesign that did away with its clever melding of Web search results, images, news, video, and more on one page. Today, after a trial run in India, Yahoo rolled out a new service called Yahoo Glue. And I’m pleased to report that it’s an awful lot like the Ask.com I missed.

Do a search, and you get a page with filled with modules dedicated to news, images, YouTube videos, Yahoo Answers, Google (sic!) Blog Search, Wikipedia data, and more. The results you get are based in part on the sort of topic you searched for: For instance, when I searched for “Paris,” content from Lonely Planet and Panoramio images of the city were near the top.

Can I pick a few nits, though?

–Oddly enough, the one thing that Glue doesn’t include are plain ol’ Web search results, from Yahoo or anybody else. This is a separate service from search, but I’d much rather get at least a few search results as part of the package. (With Ask.com, the integrated pages were simply Ask’s primary search interface, so you always got search results.)

–Glue sometimes throws in modules only vaguely related to the subject at hand–for instance, when I searched for “Rutherford B. Hayes,” I got a module of Memeorandum links to stories about current politics.

–There weren’t Glue pages at all for some of my searches, such as “Columbia University.” In those situations, Glue offers to give you results from Yahoo Search. (Ask.com’s approach was more sophisticated–it gave you a few modules or a lot of them, but it always gave you something.)

Like Ask.com’s old format, Glue competes with Google’s Universal Search feature, which weaves results of different types into standard search results rather than breaking them out into modules. I like that approach, too. But I’m glad to have Glue, and hope that Yahoo gives it enough love that it grows and gets better with time. If you check it out, lemme know what you think.

No comments

Ballmer: Microsoft Would Still Do a Yahoo Search Deal

At Microsoft’s annual shareholder’s meeting today, CEO Steve Ballmer has put the kibosh on speculation that the company will resurrect its bid to acquire Yahoo. However, Ballmer did suggest that a search deal was possible.

Microsoft’s single-minded pursuit to acquire Yahoo never made much sense to me. Sure, it would obtain substantial search market shareover night, but it would still have to claw its way up to compete with Google. Even when the two companies are combined, Google still holds the upper hand in market share.

There is also a great deal of overlap between Microsoft and Yahoo products, and there would certainly be a culture clash among employees. Brain drain is another issue. If Microsoft were to buy Yahoo today, it would not be obtaining the talent that it would have just a few months back. It would also be costly to retain people–even its own employees, many of whom would be hesitant to spend their time at Microsoft getting caught up in turf wars.

A merger with Yahoo would distract Microsoft from important initiatives that are core to its future success, such as project Oslo, an multi-product effort to steer developers toward model driven development and service oriented architecture, as well as continued investment in the .NET Framework.

Microhoo makes no sense for Microsoft, but a search deal does-–especially now that Yahoo has shied away from its partnership with Google. AND it could still happen; Ballmer never backs off.

Aside from Microsoft, who is going to be Yahoo’s white knight now? AOL? As multiple pundits have said, that would be like tying two bricks together to see if they could float.

Yahoo needs to retool and find a successful business model to become a profitable–albeit smaller–company. Microsoft can reap the benefits of Yahoo’s search presence without stepping into that mud pit, and Yahoo can score some much needed cash. Microsoft needs to do something different to compete with Google; it can’t even pay people to use Live Search. The only people who I know that use Live Search work at Microsoft, and that’s partly because they were scolded and ordered to use it. (Word is Ballmer excoriated employees for using Google.)

One comment